Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 31:13:832202.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.832202. eCollection 2022.

Effects of Chronological Age, Relative Age, and Maturation Status on Accumulated Training Load and Perceived Exertion in Young Sub-Elite Football Players

Affiliations

Effects of Chronological Age, Relative Age, and Maturation Status on Accumulated Training Load and Perceived Exertion in Young Sub-Elite Football Players

José Eduardo Teixeira et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

The aims of this study were 1) to analyze the influence of chronological age, relative age, and biological maturation on accumulated training load and perceived exertion in young sub-elite football players and 2) to understand the interaction effects amongst age grouping, maturation status, and birth quartiles on accumulated training load and perceived exertion in this target population. A 6-week period (18 training sessions and 324 observation cases) concerning 60 young male sub-elite football players grouped into relative age (Q1 to Q4), age group (U15, U17, and U19), and maturation status (Pre-peak height velocity (PHV), Mid-PHV, and Post-PHV) was established. External training load data were collected using 18 Hz global positioning system technology (GPS), heart-rate measures by a 1 Hz short-range telemetry system, and perceived exertion with total quality recovery (TQR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). U17 players and U15 players were 2.35 (95% CI: 1.25-4.51) and 1.60 (95% CI: 0.19-4.33) times more likely to pertain to Q1 and Q3, respectively. A negative magnitude for odds ratio was found in all four quartile comparisons within maturation status (95% CI: 6.72-0.64), except for Mid-PHV on Q2 (95% CI: 0.19-4.33). Between- and within-subject analysis reported significant differences in all variables on age group comparison measures (F = 0.439 to 26.636, p = 0.000 to 0.019, η2 = 0.003-0.037), except for dynamic stress load (DSL). Between-subject analysis on maturity status comparison demonstrated significant differences for all training load measures (F = 6.593 to 14.424, p = 0.000 to 0.037, η2 = 0.020-0.092). Interaction effects were found for age group x maturity band x relative age (Λ Pillai's = 0.391, Λ Wilk's = 0.609, F = 11.385, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.391) and maturity band x relative age (Λ Pillai's = 0.252, Λ Wilk's = 0.769, F = 0.955, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.112). Current research has confirmed the effects of chronological age, relative age, and biological maturation on accumulated training load. Perceived exertion does not seem to show any differences concerning age group or maturity status. Evidence should be helpful for professionals to optimize the training process and young football players' performance.

Keywords: GPS; RPE; growth; heart rate; workload; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Baseline characteristics accumulated training load and perceived exertion according to age - grouping (A1-A4) maturity band (B1-B4) and relative age (C1-C4) using z score. Abbreviations: ACC - acceleration; AvHR - average heart rate. AvS - average speed; DEC - deceleration; HMLD - high metabolic load distance; HRmax - maximal heart rate; MRS - maximum running speed; n - number of events; RPE - ratings of perceived exertion; SPR - average sprint distance; SPR_N - number of sprints; sRPE - session ratings of perceived exertion; TD - total distance; TQR - total quality recovery; TRIMP - training impulse; U - Under; DSL - Dynamic stress load; PHV - peak height velocity.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Standardized (Cohen) difference for external training load, hear rate - based measures and perceived exertion according to age group (A1-A3) and maturation bands (B1-B3) post - hoc comparisons (A1) Pre-vs Mid-PHV; (A2) Pre-vs Post-PHV; (A3) Pre-vs Mid-PHV; (B1) Pre-va Mid-PHV; (B2) Pre-vs Post-PHV. Significant differences are verified as: (A) U15 vs. U17; (B) U15 vs. U19; (C) U17 vs. U19. Abbreviations: ACC - acceleration; AvHR - average heart rate. AvS - average speed; DEC - deceleration; HMLD - high metabolic load distance; HRmax - maximal heart rate; MRS - maximum running speed; n - number of events; PHV - peak height velocity; RPE - ratings of perceived exertion; SPR - average sprint distance; SPR_N - number of sprints; sRPE - session ratings of perceived exertion; TD - total distance; TQR - total quality recovery; TRIMP - training impulse; U - Under; DSL - dynamic stress load; PHV - peak height velocity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abade E. A., Gonçalves B. V., Leite N. M., Sampaio J. E. (2014). Time-Motion and Physiological Profile of Football Training Sessions Performed by Under-15, Under-17, and Under-19 Elite Portuguese Players. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 9, 463–470. 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0120 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akubat I., Barrett S., Abt G. (2014). Integrating the Internal and External Training Loads in Soccer. Int. J. Sport Physiol. Perform. 9, 457–462. 10.1123/IJSPP.2012-0347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akubat I., Patel E., Barrett S., Abt G. (2012). Methods of Monitoring the Training and Match Load and Their Relationship to Changes in Fitness in Professional Youth Soccer Players. J. Sports Sci. 30, 1473–1480. 10.1080/02640414.2012.712711 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arede J., Cumming S., Johnson D., Leite N. (2021). The Effects of Maturity Matched and Un-matched Opposition on Physical Performance and Spatial Exploration Behavior during Youth Basketball Matches. PLoS ONE 16 (4), e0249739. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249739 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bangsbo J., Iaia F. M., Krustrup P. (2008). The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test. Sports Med. 38, 37–51. 10.2165/00007256-200838010-00004 - DOI - PubMed