Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 5;6(4):2100139.
doi: 10.1002/gch2.202100139. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Novel Insight into the Concept of Favorable Combination of Electrodes in High Voltage Supercapacitors: Toward Ultrahigh Volumetric Energy Density and Outstanding Rate Capability

Affiliations

Novel Insight into the Concept of Favorable Combination of Electrodes in High Voltage Supercapacitors: Toward Ultrahigh Volumetric Energy Density and Outstanding Rate Capability

George Elsa et al. Glob Chall. .

Abstract

Most of the biomass-derived carbon-based supercapacitors using organic electrolytes exhibit very low energy density due to their low operating potential range between 2.7 and 3.0 V. A novel insight into the concept of the different porous architecture of electrode materials that is employed to extend a device's operating potential up to 3.4 V using TEABF4 in acetonitrile, is reported. The combination of two high surface area activated carbons derived from abundant natural resources such as industrial waste cotton and wheat flour as sustainable and green carbon precursors is explored as an economical and efficient supercapacitor carbon electrode. Benefitting from the simultaneous achievement of the higher potential window (3.4 V) with higher volumetric capacitance (101 F cm-3), the supercapacitor electrodes exhibit higher volumetric energy density (42.85 Wh L-1). Bimodal pore size distribution of carbon with a tuned pore size and high specific surface area of the electrode can promote the fast transport of cations and anions. Hence, it exhibits a high rate capability even at 30 A g-1. In addition, the electrodes remain stable during operation cell voltage at 3.4 V upon 15 000 charging-discharging cycles with 90% capacitance retention.

Keywords: carbons; high durability; supercapacitors; volumetric capacitance; volumetric energy density.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall concept of favorable combination of electrodes for high voltage supercapacitors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surface morphology of the supercapacitor carbons examined by SEM analysis: a) ACF, b) AWF, c) ACF electrode, d) AWF electrode, e,f) cross‐section of ACF and AWF electrodes, g,h) elemental mapping of cross‐section of ACF and AWF electrodes, i,j) EDAX analysis of ACF and AWF.
Figure 3
Figure 3
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of ACF and AWF: a) BET isotherm, b) average pore size versus pore volume, c) cumulative surface area versus pore size, d) cumulative pore volume versus pore size.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Electrochemical performances of ACF, AWF and combination of supercapacitor electrodes: a–c) ACF, d–f) AWF, g–i) combination of supercapacitor electrodes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
EIS of supercapacitor electrodes: a) ACF, b) AWF, c) combination of ACF//AWF supercapacitor electrodes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Electrochemical performances of combination of ACF//AWF supercapacitor electrodes. a) CV curves at 5 mV s–1, b) CV curves with different scan rates (5–1000 mV s–1), c) GCD, d) EIS.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The rate capability, energy and power densities of combination of ACF//AWF supercapacitor electrodes. a) Gravimetric capacitance at various current densities, b) volumetric capacitance at various current densities, c) gravimetric energy density versus power density, d) volumetric energy density versus power density.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Durability test of the supercapacitor electrodes. a) Cycling stability, b) holding test.

References

    1. Staaf L. G. H., Lundgren P., Enoksson P., Nano Energy 2014, 9, 128.
    1. Abioye A. M., Ani F. N., Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 1282.
    1. Lu H., Zhao X. S., Sustainable Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 1265.
    1. Kim C., Moon J. H., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19682. - PubMed
    1. Liu C. F., Liu Y. C., Yi T. Y., Hu C. C., Carbon 2019, 145, 529.

LinkOut - more resources