Efficacy and tolerability of colonoscopies in overweight and obese patients: Results from a national database on gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes
- PMID: 35433209
- PMCID: PMC9010095
- DOI: 10.1055/a-1672-3525
Efficacy and tolerability of colonoscopies in overweight and obese patients: Results from a national database on gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes
Abstract
Background and study aims Gastroenterologists are encountering a rising number of obese patients requiring colonoscopy. Existing literature regarding colonoscopy outcomes in this population is scant and conflicting. We analyzed a nationwide cohort of patients to identify the effects of body mass index (BMI) on colonoscopy success, efficacy, and tolerability. Patients and methods The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI) endoscopic database was queried for all colonoscopies in adults between 2008-2014. Patients were stratified into four cohorts based on BMI classification for comparison. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify the effect of BMI on procedure outcome, efficacy and tolerability. Results Of 41,401 procedures, 27,696 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 49.4 % were performed for colorectal cancer screening, most commonly under anesthesia directed sedation. Patient discomfort was the reason for an incomplete colonoscopy in 18.7 % of all cases, and more frequent among the overweight and obese cohorts. An inadequate bowel preparation was most common in the class III obesity cohort. Compared to the normal BMI group, a BMI ≥ 30 and < 40 kg/m 2 was associated with an increased odds of an incomplete colonoscopy ( P = 0.001for overweight, P = 0.0004 for class I/II obesity), longer procedure ( P < 0.05 for all) and poorer tolerance ( P < 0.0001 for class I/II obesity, P = 0.016 for class III obesity). Anesthesia-administered sedation was more commonly used than endoscopist directed sedation amongst the obese cohort compared with the normal BMI cohort ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions Endoscopists should consider the increased odds of incomplete colonoscopy, longer procedures, and poorer tolerance when performing colonoscopy in obese patients to improve clinical management and procedural outcome.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation in overweight and obese adults: subanalysis by body mass index from a phase III, assessor-blinded study.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 9;13:1756284820910050. doi: 10.1177/1756284820910050. eCollection 2020. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32313553 Free PMC article.
-
Repeat colonoscopy's value in gastrointestinal bleeding.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb 16;5(2):56-61. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.56. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23424062 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying who best tolerates moderate sedation: Results from a national database of gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr 16;13(4):97-110. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i4.97. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33959232 Free PMC article.
-
Does time of day matter for colonoscopy quality? A review of over 13,000 screening colonoscopies in a colorectal surgery unit.Am J Surg. 2022 Mar;223(3):500-502. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.032. Epub 2021 Dec 2. Am J Surg. 2022. PMID: 34916039 Review.
-
Increased body mass index and adjusted mortality in ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2016 Jun 15;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1360-z. Crit Care. 2016. PMID: 27306751 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Construction and validation of a machine learning algorithm-based predictive model for difficult colonoscopy insertion.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):108307. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108307. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40677572 Free PMC article.
-
Cecal intubation rates: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.IGIE. 2024 Sep;1(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.igie.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Jul 22. IGIE. 2024. PMID: 39399249 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685. World J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37077514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Race, age, and sex differences on the influence of obesity on colorectal cancer sidedness and mortality: A national cross-sectional study.J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;127(1):109-118. doi: 10.1002/jso.27096. Epub 2022 Sep 16. J Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36112396 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Seibert R G, Hanchate A D, Berz J P et al.National disparities in colorectal cancer screening among obese adults. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:e41–e49. - PubMed
-
- Vargo J J. Procedural sedation and obesity: waters left uncharted. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:980–984. - PubMed
-
- Moore L L, Bradlee M L, Singer M R et al.BMI and waist circumference as predictors of lifetime colon cancer risk in Framingham Study adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:559–567. - PubMed
-
- Lucendo A J. Colonoscopy in obese patients: time to change position. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:608–609. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous