Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov:32:185-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

A Redox-Active Organic Cation for Safer Metallic Lithium-Based Batteries

Affiliations

A Redox-Active Organic Cation for Safer Metallic Lithium-Based Batteries

Weixiao Ji et al. Energy Storage Mater. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Safety concerns have severely impeded the practical application of high-energy-density lithium-based batteries. Dendrite growth and overcharging can lead to particularly catastrophic thermal failure. Here we report an organic cation, trisaminocyclopropenium (TAC), as a bi-functional electrolyte additive to suppress dendrite growth and offer reversible overcharge protection for metallic lithium-based batteries. During the Li plating process, TAC cations with aliphatic chains can form a positively charged electrostatic shield around Li protrusions, repelling the approaching Li+ and thereby attaining a more uniform plating. A two times longer cycle life of 300 h at 1 mA cm-2 is achieved in a Li|Li symmetric cell in comparison with the control. During the overcharging process, the redox-active TAC can repeatedly shuttle between two electrodes, maintaining the cell voltage within a safe value. A solid protection of 117 cycles (~1640 h) at 0.2 C with a 100% overcharge is achieved in a LiFePO4/Li4Ti5O12 cell. This study sheds fresh light on the ability of organic cations to build safer batteries.

Keywords: dendrite suppression; electrolyte additive; metallic lithium-based batteries; overcharge protection; trisaminocyclopropenium cation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
a) A schematic illustration of cation-based electrolyte additives for dendrite suppression; b) metal cations; c) quaternary ammonium cations and d) TAC cation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
a) Li plating/stripping behaviour in electrolyte containing 50 mM TAC, the inset is a Li disk stored in the same electrolyte after six months; b) cyclic voltammograms at various scan rates; c) plots of peak current vs square root of the scan rate and linear fits; d) cyclic voltammograms scanned at 100 mV s−1; e) photographs of the as-synthesized TAC cation salt and dication salt, photographs of holding a electrochemical device contained TAC cation electrolyte at a constant-potential of 4.1 V (vs. Li+/Li); f) UV-vis spectra of TAC cation and dication solutions.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Electrochemical performance of Li plating/stripping in TAC electrolyte. a) Voltage profiles of Li|Li symmetric cells cycling at 1 mA cm−2 1 mAh cm−2; b) Coulombic efficiencies of Li|Cu asymmetric cells cycling at 0.5 mA cm−2 1 mAh cm−2 and c) the voltage profiles of Li|Cu cell at 1st and 120th; d) in-situ optical microscopic images during Li plating process at 4 mA cm−2, scale bar 200 μm; e) schematic illustration of a cation-shield mechanism. Note: the TAC cation is not drawn to scale.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
a) Comparison of cyclic voltammograms between LFP and TAC at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 and 20 mV s−1, respectively; b) cycling performance of LFP/Li cell with 100% overcharge; LFP/LTO cell: c) voltage profiles with 100% overcharge at different current rates; d) continuously charging voltage profile at 0.5 C; e) cycling performance with 100% overcharge at 0.2 C; f) normal cycling performance at 0.5 C between 1.5–2.2 V, inset is the voltage profiles of the first two cycles; g) normal rate performance between 1.5–2.2 V.

References

    1. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon J-M, Nat. Mater 11 (2012) 19–29. - PubMed
    1. Wang Q, Ping P, Zhao X, Chu G, Sun J, Chen C, J. Power Sources 208 (2012) 210–224
    1. Feng X, Ouyang M, Liu X, Lu L, Xia Y, He X, Energy Storage Mater 10 (2018) 246–267
    1. Finegan DP, Scheel M, Robinson JB, Tjaden B, Hunt I, Mason TJ, Millichamp J, Di Michiel M, Offer GJ, Hinds G, Brett DJL, Shearing PR, Nature Comm 6 (2015) 6924. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kushima A, So KP, Su C, Bai P, Kuriyama N, Maebashi T, Fujiwara Y, Bazant MZ, Li J, Nano Energy 32 (2017) 271–279

LinkOut - more resources