Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec:2:100082.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100082. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

The making of a Swedish strategy: How organizational culture shaped the Public Health Agency's pandemic response

Affiliations

The making of a Swedish strategy: How organizational culture shaped the Public Health Agency's pandemic response

Tobias Olofsson et al. SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Several suggestions have been made as to why Sweden's approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic came to rely on a strategy based on voluntary measures. Two of the most prominent explanations for why the country chose a different strategy than many other countries have focused on micro- and macro-level factors, explaining the strategy either in terms of the psychologies of prominent actors or by pointing to particularities in Swedish constitutional law. Supported by a qualitative analysis using interviews and text analysis, we argue that the Swedish strategy cannot be understood without paying attention to the meso-level and the organizations that produced the strategy. Moreover, we argue that to understand why one of the central organizations in Swedish pandemic management, the Public Health Agency, came to favor certain interventions, one must investigate the culture of production inside the organization and how it created precedents that led the Agency to approach pandemic management with a focus on balancing current and future health risks.

Keywords: COVID-19; Culture of production; Organizations; Pandemic crisis; Sweden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Bækkeskov E. Explaining science-led policy-making: Pandemic deaths, epistemic deliberation and ideational trajectories. Policy Sciences. 2016;49(4):395–419. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9264-y. - DOI
    1. Baldwin P. Cambridge University Press; 2021. Fighting the first wave: Why the coronavirus was tackled so differently across the globe.
    1. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. Penguin Books; 1991. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.
    1. Boin A., McConnell A., ’t Hart P. Springer International Publishing; 2021. Governing the pandemic: The politics of navigating a mega-crisis. - DOI
    1. Bylund P.L., Packard M.D. Separation of power and expertise: Evidence of the tyranny of experts in Sweden's COVID-19 responses. Southern Economic Journal. 2021;87(4):1300–1319. doi: 10.1002/soej.12493. - DOI - PMC - PubMed