[The value of relaxation time quantitative technique from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and invasion assessment of prostate cancer]
- PMID: 35436808
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20211018-02304
[The value of relaxation time quantitative technique from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and invasion assessment of prostate cancer]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the application value of relaxation time quantitative technique from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and invasion assessment of prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 119 patients with prostate diseases [122 regions of interest(ROI)] who underwent routine MRI scan and magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC) sequence of prostate from March 2020 to March 2021 in General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University were retrospectively collected, they were divided into prostate cancer group(58 cases, 61 ROI) and non-prostate cancer group(61 cases, 61 ROI) according to the pathological results. In the prostate cancer group, those patients with an age of 48 to 85(69.8±5.9) years, and further divided into two subgroups according to the location of occurrence: peripheral zone cancer group (43 cases, 45 ROI) and transitional zone cancer group (15 cases, 16 ROI). The non-prostate cancer group consisted of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia or complicated with chronic prostatitis, with an age of 41 to 81(68.6±7.0) years, and they were further divided into two subgroups according to the location of occurrence: non-cancerous peripheral zone group (45 cases, 45 ROI) and transitional zone benign prostatic hyperplasia group(16 cases, 16 ROI). Prostate cancer lesions were classified as low risk (Gleason score ≤6) or intermediate/high risk (Gleason score ≥7). After the post-processing of MAGiC images, T1, T2 and proton density(PD) values of prostate cancer group and non-prostate cancer group were obtained. At the same time, relevant software were used for image post-processing to generate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, the data between the two groups were analyzed by the Independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test, and the diagnostic effectiveness of each quantitative parameter in diagnosing prostate cancer and discriminating low risk prostate cancer from intermediate/high risk prostate cancer was analyzed by using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the correlation between each quantitative parameter and Gleason score were assessed by Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The T1 value and T2 value of the peripheral zone cancer group were lower than those in non-cancerous peripheral zone group [1 201.3 (1 103.5, 1 298.2) ms vs 2 274.0 (1 620.9, 2 776.5) ms; 78.0 (74.0, 83.8) ms vs (160.6±54.9) ms] (all P<0.001), there was no statistically significant in PD value between the two groups (P>0.05). The T1 value and T2 value of the transitional zone cancer group were lower than those in transitional zone benign prostatic hyperplasia group [1 073.3 (1 003.9, 1 164.9) ms vs 1 340.8 (1 208.5, 1 502.8) ms; 76.9 (74.8, 82.8) ms vs 95.1(82.8, 103.4) ms] (all P<0.001), there was no statistically significant in PD value between the two groups (P>0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of T2 value was similar with the ADC value in discriminating peripheral zone cancer group from non-cancerous peripheral zone group(0.963 vs 0.991, P=0.105), while in discriminating transitional zone cancer group from transitional zone benign prostatic hyperplasia group, the AUC of T2 value、T1 value and ADC value were similar(0.867, 0.930 vs 0.938, all P>0.05). ADC value, T2 value all were negatively correlated with Gleason score (r=-0.747,-0.453, all P<0.001). T2 value and ADC value demonstrated equivalent diagnostic performance in discriminating low risk from intermediate/high risk prostate cancer, and there were no statistically significant (AUC: 0.787 vs 0.943, P=0.069). Conclusions: Quantitative relaxation time T1 and T2 values derived from synthetic MRI can discriminate prostate cancer from other benign pathologies, and T2 value have the equivalent diagnostic performance compared to ADC value. Synthetic MRI has high clinical application value, and T2 value can distinguish low risk prostate cancer from intermediate/high risk prostate cancer.
目的: 探讨集成MRI弛豫时间定量技术在前列腺癌诊断及侵袭性评估中的应用价值。 方法: 回顾性搜集2020年3月至2021年3月宁夏医科大学总医院行前列腺MRI常规序列和磁共振图像编译(MAGiC)序列扫描的前列腺疾病患者119例[共122个感兴趣区(ROI)],依据病理结果分为前列腺癌组(58例,61个ROI)和非前列腺癌组(61例,61个ROI)。前列腺癌组为前列腺癌患者,年龄48~85(69.8±5.9)岁,依据发生部位分为两个亚组:外周带癌组(43例,45个ROI)和中央腺体癌组(15例,16个ROI)。非前列腺癌组为良性前列腺增生或合并慢性前列腺炎患者,年龄41~81(68.6±7.0)岁,依据发生部位分为两个亚组:外周带非癌组(45例,45个ROI)和中央腺体良性前列腺增生组(16例,16个ROI)。前列腺癌病灶分为低危(GS≤6分)和中/高危(GS≥7分)。前列腺癌组和非前列腺癌组 MAGiC图像经过后处理后得到T1、T2、质子密度(PD)值,同时用相关软件进行后处理生成表观扩散系数(ADC)值,并采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验分析两组间数据的比较,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各定量参数诊断前列腺癌和鉴别低危、中高危前列腺癌的诊断效能,采用Spearman相关分析评估各定量参数与Gleason评分的相关性。 结果: 外周带癌组的T1值和T2值[M(Q1,Q3)]均低于外周带非癌组[1 201.3(1 103.5,1 298.2)ms比2 274.0(1 620.9,2 776.5)ms;78.0(74.0,83.8)ms比(160.6±54.9)ms](均P<0.001),两组PD 值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。中央腺体癌组的T1值和T2值均低于中央腺体良性前列腺增生组[1 073.3(1 003.9,1 164.9)ms比1 340.8(1 208.5,1 502.8)ms;76.9(74.8,82.8)ms比95.1(82.8,103.4)ms](均P<0.001),两组PD值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。区分外周带癌组与外周带非癌组时,T2值显示出与ADC值相似的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.963比0.991,P=0.105),而区分中央腺体癌组与中央腺体良性前列腺增生组时,T2值、T1值与ADC值的AUC均相似(0.867、0.930 比0.938,两两之间均P>0.05)。ADC值、T2值均与 Gleason评分呈负相关(r=-0.747、-0.453,均P<0.001)。T2值和ADC值在区分低危和中高危前列腺癌时的诊断效能相当,差异无统计学意义(AUC:0.787比0.943,P=0.069)。 结论: 集成MRI获得的定量T1和T2值能够鉴别前列腺癌和其他良性病变,T2值与ADC值诊断效能相当。集成MRI具有较高的临床应用价值,T2值能够区分低危与中高危前列腺癌。.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical