Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605221091665.
doi: 10.1177/03000605221091665.

Spinal metastasis: narrative reviews of the current evidence and treatment modalities

Affiliations
Review

Spinal metastasis: narrative reviews of the current evidence and treatment modalities

Pilan Jaipanya et al. J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

The treatment for spinal metastasis has evolved significantly during the past decade. An advancement in systemic therapy has led to a prolonged overall survival in cancer patients, thus increasing the incidence of spinal metastasis. In addition, with the improved treatment armamentarium, the prediction of patient survival using traditional prognostic models may have limitations and these require the incorporation of some novel parameters to improve their prognostic accuracy. The development of minimally-invasive spinal procedures and minimal access surgical techniques have facilitated a quicker patient recovery and return to systemic treatment. These modern interventions help to alleviate pain and improve quality of life, even in candidates with a relatively short life expectancy. Radiotherapy may be considered in non-surgical candidates or as adjuvant therapy for improving local tumour control. Stereotactic radiosurgery has facilitated this even in radioresistant tumours and may even replace surgery in radiosensitive malignancies. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence leading to the paradigm shifts in the modern treatment of spinal metastasis.

Keywords: Spinal metastasis; spinal cord compression; spinal metastasis surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Treatment algorithm for spinal metastasis. ESCC, epidural spinal cord compression; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; cEBRT, conventional external beam radiotherapy; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery. The colour version of this figure is available at: http://imr.sagepub.com.

References

    1. Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Diagnosis and Management of Patients at Risk of or with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. Cardiff (UK): National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK); 2008. Nov. PMID: 22171401. - PubMed
    1. Perrin RG, Laxton AW. Metastatic spine disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and evaluation of patients. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004; 15: 365–373. - PubMed
    1. Nater A, Martin AR, Sahgal A, et al.. Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0171507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bollen L, van der Linden YM, Pondaag W, et al.. Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1,043 patients. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16: 991–998. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rades D, Hueppe M, Schild SE. A score to identify patients with metastatic spinal cord compression who may be candidates for best supportive care. Cancer 2013; 119: 897–903. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources