Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 19;6(4):e27692.
doi: 10.2196/27692.

Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury: Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Ingebjørg Irgens  1   2 , Jana Midelfart-Hoff  3   4 , Rolf Jelnes  5 , Marcalee Alexander  6   7   8 , Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle  2 , Magne Thoresen  9 , Tiina Rekand  3   10
Affiliations

Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury: Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Ingebjørg Irgens et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Geographical, financial and travel-related barriers may impact access to necessary health care for people in need of long-term follow-up.

Objective: The goal of the research was to perform a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healing, interaction, and satisfaction of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and PI receiving multidisciplinary videoconference consultations from a wound clinic to the participant's home versus regular outpatient care. The multidisciplinary team consisted of a medical doctor, a wound nurse, and an occupational therapist. In both groups, district nurses attended the consultations at the participant's home.

Methods: A total of 56 participants, 28 in each group, were randomized to a videoconference group (VCG) or a regular care group (RCG). Validated questionnaires were used to measure and compare the follow-up effect on HRQoL. Percentage reduction of wound volume was measured at end of the follow-up. A Likert scale was used to measure the satisfaction of the patients and district nurses regarding the interaction between different modalities of care in the 2 groups.

Results: The HRQoL did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P values ranging from .09 to .88) or the rate of PI healing, experienced interaction, and satisfaction in the groups. A total of 67% (37/55) of all PIs healed, 64% (18/28) in the VCG and 70% (19/27) in the RCG. Mean reduction in ulcer volume was 79% in the VCG and 85% in the RCG (P=.32). A Kaplan-Meier plot with a logrank test regarding time to healing did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Videoconference-based care seems to be a safe and efficient way to manage PIs in terms of HRQoL, healing, interaction, and satisfaction compared to conventional care for people with SCI. This should be considered when planning for future care. SCI has a huge impact on the individual, the family, and the health care system. There is an urgent need to improve systems of care so that individuals who live far from specialists and require long-term follow-up for conditions such as PI can get optimal treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02800915; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02800915 and Current Research Information System in Norway (CRISTIN) 545284; https://app.cristin.no/projects/show.jsf?id=545284.

Keywords: healing; health-related quality of life; outpatient follow-up; participant interaction; participant satisfaction; pressure injury; spinal cord injury; telecommunication; telemedicine; videoconference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT 2010 (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010) flow diagram of the trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Organization of follow-up for the videoconference and regular care groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Organization of the videoconference consultations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier plot showing time to healing in the two groups (videoconference: solid line; regular care group: dotted line).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Access to Health Services/Healthy People 2020. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2020. [2021-06-02]. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/leading-health-indicators/2020-lhi-to... .
    1. Siwicki B. Telemedicine during COVID-19: benefits, limitations, burdens, adaptation. Healthcare ITNews. 2020. Mar, [2020-04-28]. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telemedicine-during-covid-19-benef... .
    1. Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health. 2013 Oct;38(5):976–993. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23543372 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irgens I, Kleven L, Sørli H, Stanghelle JK, Rekand T. Telemedicine brings specialist healthcare services to patients' homes. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2015 Oct 20;135(19):1716–1717. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0770. http://tidsskriftet.no/article/3399760 3399760 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lidal IB, Snekkevik H, Aamodt G, Hjeltnes N, Biering-Sørensen F, Stanghelle JK. Mortality after spinal cord injury in Norway. J Rehabil Med. 2007 Mar;39(2):145–151. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0017. https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/abstract/10.2340/16501977-0017 - DOI - DOI - PubMed

Associated data