Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;40(3):410-421.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12413. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

Children's developing views of social excluders: A dissociation between social evaluation and partner preference

Amanda Mae Woodward  1 , Lindsay A Horen  2 , Sarah J Knoll  3 , Jonathan S Beier  4
Affiliations

Children's developing views of social excluders: A dissociation between social evaluation and partner preference

Amanda Mae Woodward et al. Br J Dev Psychol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

When facing social exclusion, children seek to strengthen existing social connections and form new ones. This study asked whether they also make strategic choices about the targets of their affiliative goals. Three- to six-year-olds (N = 69; 36 female; mostly non-Hispanic White) observed characters acting inclusively or exclusively. All ages viewed excluders more negatively than includers, but only five- and six-year-olds preferred includers as play partners. Despite easily detecting and remembering exclusion events, younger children expressed no play partner preference. Children's verbal justifications revealed that older children choose partners more carefully and draw on a richer understanding of exclusion. More generally, the initial dissociation between social evaluation and preference formation underscores that these are distinct processes with different developmental trajectories.

Keywords: play preferences; social evaluation; social exclusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic of procedure. Note. This schematic depicts the content displayed on the two tablets children interacted with. The order of games was counterbalanced across children
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Children's social evaluations and play partner preferences. Note. The shaded areas depict 95% confidence intervals
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Buon, M. , Jacob, P. , Margules, S. , Brunet, I. , Dutat, M. , Cabrol, D. , & Dupoux, E. (2014). Friend or foe? Early social evaluation of human interactions. PLoS One, 9(2), e88612. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088612 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crick, N. R. , Casas, J. F. , & Mosher, M. (1997). Relational and overt aggression in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 579–588. 10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.579 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Klerk, C. , Albiston, H. , Bulgarelli, C. , Southgate, V. , & Hamilton, A. (2020). Observing third‐party ostracism enhances facial mimicry in 30‐month‐olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 196, 104862. 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104862 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartgerink, C. H. J. , Van Beest, I. , Wicherts, J. M. , & Williams, K. D. (2015). The ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta‐analysis of 120 cyberball studies. PLoS One, 10(5), e0127002. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(3), 213–235. 10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00073-0 - DOI - PubMed