Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e061554.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061554.

Protocol of the Fit-For-Fertility study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing a lifestyle programme targeting women with obesity and infertility

Collaborators, Affiliations

Protocol of the Fit-For-Fertility study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing a lifestyle programme targeting women with obesity and infertility

Matea Belan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Women with obesity are at a higher risk of infertility as well as gestational and neonatal complications. Lifestyle changes are universally recommended for women with obesity seeking fertility treatments, but such intervention has only been assessed in very few robust studies. This study's objectives are therefore to assess the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an interdisciplinary lifestyle intervention (the Fit-For-Fertility Programme; FFFP) targeting women with obesity and subfertility in a diverse population.

Methods and analysis: This pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will include 616 women with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 or ≥27 kg/m2 with polycystic ovary syndrome or at-risk ethnicities) who are evaluated at a Canadian fertility clinic for subfertility. Women will be randomised either to (1) the FFFP (experimental arm) alone for 6 months, and then in combination with usual care for infertility if not pregnant; or (2) directly to usual fertility care (control arm). Women in the intervention group benefit from the programme up to 18 months or, if pregnant, up to 24 months or the end of the pregnancy (whichever comes first). Women from both groups are evaluated every 6 months for a maximum of 18 months. The primary outcome is live birth rate at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes; lifestyle and anthropometric measures; and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative data collected from focus groups of participants and professionals will also be analysed.

Ethics and dissemination: This research study has been approved by the Research Ethics Board (REB) of Centre intégré universtaire de santé et des services sociaux de l'Estrie-CHUS (research coordinating centre) on 10 December 2018 and has been or will be approved successively by each participating centres' REB. This pragmatic RCT will inform decision-makers on improving care trajectories and policies regarding fertility treatments for women with obesity and subfertility.

Trial registration number: NCT03908099.

Protocol version: 1.1, 13 April 2019.

Keywords: Diabetes & endocrinology; Health economics; Protocols & guidelines; Reproductive medicine; Subfertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Ferring has provided an unrestricted grant for the trial, without influencing the design or conduct of the trial, or the analysis or dissemination of the study’s results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fit-For-Fertility’s study flowchart. CHUM, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal; CHUQ, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; CHUS, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, et al. . Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada. Hum Reprod 2012;27:738–46. 10.1093/humrep/der465 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. . The International glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod 2017;32:1786–801. 10.1093/humrep/dex234 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandes M, Hamilton CJCM, de Bruin JP, et al. . The relative contribution of IVF to the total ongoing pregnancy rate in a subfertile cohort. Hum Reprod 2010;25:118–26. 10.1093/humrep/dep341 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rebar RW. What are the risks of the assisted reproductive technologies (art) and how can they be minimized? Reprod Med Biol 2013;12:151–8. 10.1007/s12522-013-0156-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeAngelis AM, Martini AE, Owen CM. Assisted reproductive technology and epigenetics. Semin Reprod Med 2018;36:221–32. 10.1055/s-0038-1675780 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data