Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review
- PMID: 35441421
- DOI: 10.1111/birt.12640
Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review
Abstract
Background: The United States has the highest perinatal morbidity and mortality (M&M) rates among all high-resource countries in the world. Birth settings (birth center, home, or hospital) influence clinical outcomes, experience of care, and health care costs. Increasing use of low-intervention birth settings can reduce perinatal M&M. This integrative review evaluated factors influencing birth setting decision making among women and birthing people in the United States.
Methods: A search strategy was implemented within the CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guided the review, and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model was used to evaluate methodological quality and appraisal of the evidence. The Whittemore and Knafl integrative review framework informed the extraction and analysis of the data and generation of findings.
Results: We identified 23 articles that met inclusion criteria. Four analytical themes were generated that described factors that influence birth setting decision making in the United States: "Birth Setting Safety vs. Risk," "Influence of Media, Family, and Friends on Birth Setting Awareness," "Presence or Absence of Choice and Control," and "Access to Options."
Discussion: Supporting women and birthing people to make informed decisions by providing information about birth setting options and variations in models of care by birth setting is a critical patient-centered strategy to ensure equitable access to low-intervention birth settings. Policies that expand affordable health insurance to cover midwifery care in all birth settings are needed to enable people to make informed choices about birth location that align with their values, individual pregnancy characteristics, and preferences.
Keywords: United States; birth setting; decision making; perinatal care.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Hoyert DL, Minino AM. Maternal mortality in the United States: changes in coding, publication, and data release, 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020;69(2):1-16.
-
- Neal JL, Carlson NS, Phillippi JC, et al. Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low-risk nulliparous women: a consortium on safe labor study. Birth. 2019;46(3):475-486. doi:10.1111/birt.12407
-
- Franck LS, McLemore MR, Williams S, et al. Research priorities of women at risk for preterm birth: findings and a call to action. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2664-1
-
- Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths - United States, 2007-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(35):762-765. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6835a3
-
- Bingham D, Jones DK, Howell EA. Quality improvement approach to eliminate disparities in perinatal morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019;46(2):227-238. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2019.01.006
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
