Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;36(6):e24410.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.24410. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

Performance evaluation of STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag home test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 during early symptom onset

Affiliations

Performance evaluation of STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag home test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 during early symptom onset

Hyoshim Shin et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Surveillance and control of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak through gold standard detection, that is, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), become a great obstacle, especially in overwhelming outbreaks. In this study, we aimed to analyze the performance of rapid antigen home test (RAHT) as an alternative detection method compared with RT-PCR.

Methods: In total, 79 COVID-19-positive and 217 COVID-19-negative patients confirmed by RT-PCR were enrolled in this study. A duration from symptom onset to COVID-19 confirmation of <5 days was considered a recruiting criterion for COVID-19-positive cases. A nasal cavity specimen was collected for the RAHT, and a nasopharyngeal swab specimen was collected for RT-PCR.

Results: Sensitivity of the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Home Test (SD Biosensor, Korea), compared with RT-PCR, was 94.94% (75/79) (95% [confidence interval] CI, 87.54%-98.60%), and specificity was 100%. Sensitivity was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (98.00%) than in asymptomatic (89.66%) patients (p-value = 0.03). There was no difference in sensitivity according to the duration of symptom onset to confirmation (100% for 0-2 days and 96.97% for 3-5 days, respectively) (p-value = 1.00). The RAHT detected all 51 COVID-19 patients whose Ct values were ≤25 (100%), whereas sensitivity was 73.33% (11/15) among patients with Ct values >25 (p-value = 0.01).

Conclusion: The RAHT showed an excellent sensitivity for COVID-19-confirmed cases, especially for those with symptoms. There was a decrease in sensitivity when the Ct value is over 25, indicating that RAHT screening may be useful during the early phase of symptom onset, when the viral numbers are higher and it is more transmissible.

Keywords: COVID-19 testing; SARS-CoV-2; diagnosis; point of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Relationship between the days after symptom onset and the cycle threshold (Ct) values of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase gene (RdRp) from symptomatic patients (N = 50)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID‐19 a pandemic. Acta Bio Medica. 2020;91:157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malekifar P, Pakzad R, Shahbahrami R, et al. Viral coinfection among COVID‐19 patient groups: an update systematic review and meta‐analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:1‐10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soltani S, Zakeri A, Zandi M, et al. The role of bacterial and fungal human respiratory microbiota in COVID‐19 patients. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:1‐13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pakzad R, Malekifar P, Shateri Z, et al. Worldwide prevalence of microbial agents’ coinfection among COVID‐19 patients: a comprehensive updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36:e24151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zandi M, Farahani A, Zakeri A, et al. Clinical symptoms and types of samples are critical factors for the molecular diagnosis of symptomatic COVID‐19 patients: a systematic literature review. Int J Microbiol. 2021;2021:1‐20. - PMC - PubMed

Substances