Performance evaluation of STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag home test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 during early symptom onset
- PMID: 35441745
- PMCID: PMC9110955
- DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24410
Performance evaluation of STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag home test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 during early symptom onset
Abstract
Background: Surveillance and control of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak through gold standard detection, that is, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), become a great obstacle, especially in overwhelming outbreaks. In this study, we aimed to analyze the performance of rapid antigen home test (RAHT) as an alternative detection method compared with RT-PCR.
Methods: In total, 79 COVID-19-positive and 217 COVID-19-negative patients confirmed by RT-PCR were enrolled in this study. A duration from symptom onset to COVID-19 confirmation of <5 days was considered a recruiting criterion for COVID-19-positive cases. A nasal cavity specimen was collected for the RAHT, and a nasopharyngeal swab specimen was collected for RT-PCR.
Results: Sensitivity of the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Home Test (SD Biosensor, Korea), compared with RT-PCR, was 94.94% (75/79) (95% [confidence interval] CI, 87.54%-98.60%), and specificity was 100%. Sensitivity was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (98.00%) than in asymptomatic (89.66%) patients (p-value = 0.03). There was no difference in sensitivity according to the duration of symptom onset to confirmation (100% for 0-2 days and 96.97% for 3-5 days, respectively) (p-value = 1.00). The RAHT detected all 51 COVID-19 patients whose Ct values were ≤25 (100%), whereas sensitivity was 73.33% (11/15) among patients with Ct values >25 (p-value = 0.01).
Conclusion: The RAHT showed an excellent sensitivity for COVID-19-confirmed cases, especially for those with symptoms. There was a decrease in sensitivity when the Ct value is over 25, indicating that RAHT screening may be useful during the early phase of symptom onset, when the viral numbers are higher and it is more transmissible.
Keywords: COVID-19 testing; SARS-CoV-2; diagnosis; point of care.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35171010 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0086122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00861-22. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35867471 Free PMC article.
-
Time scale performance of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2: Evaluation of 10 rapid antigen assays.J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6512-6518. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27186. Epub 2021 Jul 28. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 34241912 Free PMC article.
-
Performance and operational feasibility of antigen and antibody rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Cameroon: a clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):1089-1096. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00132-8. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33773618 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0259527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259527. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34843505 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Rapid Antigen Tests during the COVID-19 Era in Korea and Their Implementation as a Detection Tool for Other Infectious Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;10(3):322. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030322. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36978713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association Between Rapid Antigen Detection Tests and Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;68:1605452. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605452. eCollection 2023. Int J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37588042 Free PMC article.
-
Nasal swab is a good alternative sample for detecting SARS-CoV-2 with rapid antigen test: A meta-analysis.Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023 Mar-Apr;52:102548. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102548. Epub 2023 Feb 9. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36758806 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the T cell and B cell response following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Korea.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022 Dec;55(6 Pt 1):1013-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 28. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022. PMID: 36261313 Free PMC article.
-
Performance Evaluation of STANDARD Q COVID/FLU Ag Combo for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):32. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010032. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36611324 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous