Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun;58(6):953-961.
doi: 10.1111/jpc.15985. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter insertion with landmark technique in paediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tricia M Kleidon  1   2   3   4 , Jessica Schults  1   2   3   4 , Rebecca Paterson  1   2   5 , Claire M Rickard  1   2   3   4 , Amanda J Ullman  1   2   3   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter insertion with landmark technique in paediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tricia M Kleidon et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Paediatric peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion using traditional landmark insertion technique can be difficult.

Aim: To systematically review the evidence comparing landmark to ultrasound guidance for PIVC insertion in general paediatric patients.

Study design: Cochrane methodology to systematically search for randomised controlled trials comparing landmark to ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion.

Data sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, US National Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Embase.

Data extraction: English-language, paediatric trials published after 2000, reporting first-attempt insertion success, overall PIVC insertion success, and/or time to insert were included. Central venous, non-venous and trials including only difficult intravenous access were excluded. Data were independently extracted and critiqued for quality using GRADE by three authors, and analysed using random effects, with results expressed as risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Registration (CRD42020175314).

Results: Of 70 titles identified, 5 studies (995 patients; 949 PIVCs) were included. There was no evidence of an effect of ultrasound guidance, compared to landmark, for first-attempt insertion success (RR 1.27; 95% CI 0.90-1.78; I2 = 88%; moderate quality evidence), overall insertion success (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.90-1.44; I2 = 82%; low quality evidence), or time to insertion (mean difference -3.03 min; 95% CI -12.73 to 6.67; I2 = 92%; low quality evidence).

Limitations: Small sample sizes, inconsistent outcomes and definitions in primary studies precluded definitive conclusions.

Conclusions: Large clinical trials are needed to explore the effectiveness of ultrasound guidance for PIVC insertion in paediatrics. Specifically, children with difficult intravenous access might benefit most from this technology.

Keywords: catheterisation; peripheral; peripheral venous catheter; systematic review; ultrasonography; vascular access device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta‐analysis of studies reporting (a) first‐time PIVC insertion success, (b) overall PIVC insertion success, (c) time to PIVC insertion success. CI, confidence interval; PIVC, paediatric peripheral intravenous catheter.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kleidon T, Ullman A. Right device assessment and selection in pediatrics. In: Moureau NL, ed. Vessel Health and Preservation: The Right Approach for Vascular Access. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019; 181–95.
    1. Ullman AJ, Bernstein SJ, Brown E, Aiyagari R, Doellman D, Faustino EVS, Gore B, Jacobs JP, Jaffray J, Kleidon T, Mahajan PV, McBride CA, Morton K, Pitts S, Prentice E, Rivard DC, Shaughnessy E, Stranz M, Wolf J, Cooper DS, Cooke M, Rickard CM, Chopra V The Michigan appropriateness guide for intravenous catheters in pediatrics: miniMAGIC. Pediatrics 2020;145(Suppl. 3):S269, S284. - PubMed
    1. Ullman AJ, Takashima M, Kleidon T, Ray‐Barruel G, Alexandrou E, Rickard CM. Global pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter practice and performance: A secondary analysis of 4206 catheters. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2019; 50: e18–25. - PubMed
    1. Kleidon TM, Cattanach P, Mihala G, Ullman AJ. Implementation of a paediatric peripheral intravenous catheter care bundle: A quality improvement initiative. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2019; 55: 1214–23. - PubMed
    1. Goff DA, Larsen P, Brinkley J et al. Resource utilization and cost of inserting peripheral intravenous catheters in hospitalized children. Hosp. Pediatr. 2013; 3: 185–91. - PubMed