Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;208(1):119-127.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002498. Epub 2022 May 18.

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Study

Affiliations

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Study

Shubo Fan et al. J Urol. 2022 Jul.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Materials and methods: This prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study was conducted from May 2021 to August 2021. Sixteen RARP procedures with the KD-SR-01 system were performed by 1 surgeon. The perioperative and followup data were prospectively recorded. Early oncologic outcomes were assessed according to surgical margin status and continence was defined as no more than 1 pad daily or urine leakage of ≤20 gm by the 24-hour pad weight test. Ergonomics were assessed with the NASA-TLX (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index).

Results: All cases were completed successfully without conversion to traditional RARP, laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The median docking time, console time and urethrovesical anastomosis time were 5.9 (range, 2.5-11.5), 87 (range, 70-120) and 14.4 minutes (range, 12.0-25.7), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (range, 10-200). None of patients required intraoperative transfusion. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4-10). Overall, a positive surgical margin occurred in 4 (25%) patients. No biochemical recurrence occurred within 1 month after surgery. The continence rate was 87.5% (14/16) at 1 month after catheter removal. No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred. The surgeon reported a high comfort level with a NASA-TLX global score of 22.7±3.2.

Conclusions: The KD-SR-01 system is feasible, safe and effective for management of localized prostate cancer.

Keywords: prostatic neoplasms; robotic surgical procedures; robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Cui Liang is the co-founder and stock owner of Suzhou KangDuo Robot Co., Ltd. All other authors have nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The KangDuo surgical robot. A, the surgeon control console. B, the patient cart. C, the vision cart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The interaction of the surgeon and the assistant with the KD-SR-01 system and port placement. A, the surgeon was able to control the open console without flexion of the neck. B, the assistant was stationed at the patient cart with 3 surgical arms suspended on the beam. C, port placement with point Ⅰ for robotic camera, points Ⅱ and Ⅲ for robotic instruments, and points Ⅳ and Ⅴ for the assistant. A 2 cm skin incision about 3–4 cm above the pubic symphysis (point I) was made for initial access into the retropubic space and subsequently as a camera port. A balloon was inserted and insufflated to establish, expand and maintain the retropubic space. Then, 2 extraperitoneal ports were placed about 8 cm from point Ⅰ along the exterior margin of rectus abdomen under direct vision with the left trocar (point Ⅱ) for a bipolar Maryland grasper and the right trocar (point Ⅲ) for a monopolar scissor or large needle driver. Additional ports for auxiliary trocars were placed at the midpoints of the line joining point Ⅱ/Ⅲ and the umbilicus (point Ⅳ/Ⅴ) for retraction, suction and clip placement.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Surgical technique of RARP with the KD-SR-01 system. A, suturing-ligation of the dorsal venous plexus. B, bladder neck dissection. C, preparation of the seminal vesicles. D, dissection of the rectoprostatic fascia. E, disconnection of the prostatic pedicles. F, disconnection of the urethra. G, posterior muscolofascial reconstruction. H, vesicourethral anastomosis.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Trend of console time of RARP using the KD-SR-01 system.

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Kulis T. Kulis T. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):127. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002498.02. Epub 2022 May 18. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35442763 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Herrell SD. Herrell SD. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):126-127. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002498.01. Epub 2022 May 18. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35442764 No abstract available.
  • Robotic Urologic Oncologic Surgery: Ever-Widening Horizons.
    Cacciamani G, Desai M, Siemens DR, Gill IS. Cacciamani G, et al. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):8-9. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002752. Epub 2022 May 10. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35536680 No abstract available.

References

    1. Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, et al. : Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 1994; 152: 1850. - PubMed
    1. Schuessler WW Schulam PC and Clayman RV: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1992; 147: 246. - PubMed
    1. Magheli A, Busch J, Leva N, et al. : Comparison of surgical technique (open vs. laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol 2014; 14: 18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wirth GJ, Psutka SP, Chapin BF, et al. : Midterm oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy (RP). BJU Int 2013; 112: 190. - PubMed
    1. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, et al. : Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 1341. - PubMed

Publication types