Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;43(1):1085-1093.
doi: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2060439.

Perceptions of peer and parental attitudes toward substance use and actual adolescent substance use: The impact of adolescent-confidant relationships

Megan E Marziali  1 , Natalie S Levy  1 , Silvia S Martins  1
Affiliations

Perceptions of peer and parental attitudes toward substance use and actual adolescent substance use: The impact of adolescent-confidant relationships

Megan E Marziali et al. Subst Abus. 2022.

Abstract

Objective: While peer influence is a well-documented risk factor for adolescent substance use, it remains unclear whether peer or parental attitudes have greater impact, and if this relationship is moderated by having a confidant and the relationship between adolescents and their confidant. Method: Pooled (2015-2018) National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data on adolescents (12-17 years) were used. Perceived peer and parental disapproval of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use were dichotomized. We assessed associations between disapproval and past-month tobacco (N = 51,352), alcohol (N = 51,407), and marijuana use (N = 51,355) using separate multivariable logistic regression models. We explored effect modification by the presence of a confidant, parental vs. non-parental disapproval, and peer vs. non-peer confidant relationship. Results: Peer and parental disapproval, presence of any confidant, and identifying a parental confidant were consistently protective against substance use; identifying a peer confidant increased odds of use across substances. For marijuana use, peer disapproval (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 0.08) was more protective than parental disapproval (aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.15). The joint presence of peer/parental disapproval and any confidant decreased the odds of substance use beyond the individual effects of peer/parental disapproval and having a confidant. However, having a peer confidant attenuated the protective association between peer/parental disapproval and tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use. Conclusions: Both peer and parental relationships are salient when considering the social context of adolescent substance use and should be considered when studying the effects of perceived disapproval.

Keywords: Social support; adolescent health; alcohol use; marijuana use; tobacco use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement: None of the authors report a conflict of interest.

References

    1. Leung RK, Toumbourou JW, Hemphill SA. The effect of peer influence and selection processes on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(4):426–457. - PubMed
    1. D’Amico EJ, McCarthy DM. Escalation and initiation of younger adolescents’ substance use: The impact of perceived peer use. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(4):481–487. - PubMed
    1. Mundt MP. The impact of peer social networks on adolescent alcohol use initiation. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(5):414–421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branstetter SA, Low S, Furman W. The influence of parents and friends on adolescent substance use: A multidimensional approach. J Subst Use. 2011;16(2):150–160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beardslee J, Datta S, Byrd A, et al. An examination of parental and peer influence on substance use and criminal offendingduring the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Crim Justice Behav. 2018;45(6):783–798. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types