Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 21;9(2):e35173.
doi: 10.2196/35173.

Self-care Behaviors and Technology Used During COVID-19: Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Self-care Behaviors and Technology Used During COVID-19: Systematic Review

Fareeya Sakur et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Self-care behaviors are essential for people living with chronic conditions; however, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has imposed additional complications on their daily routines. Few studies have analyzed how self-care behaviors have changed during COVID-19 and the role of digital technology, especially among people with chronic conditions.

Objective: This study aims to review how self-care behaviors have changed for people with chronic conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what technology they have adopted to manage their conditions during that period.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using narrative synthesis. Data were extracted from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, including articles from December 2019 onward. Eligible studies focused on adults diagnosed with chronic conditions undertaking any self-care tasks in line with the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness (ie, self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management). The methodological quality of the included articles was assessed with the McMaster Critical Review Forms for Quantitative or Qualitative Studies.

Results: In total, 36 primary research articles were included. Changes to self-care behaviors during COVID-19 among people with chronic conditions were organized according to the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness focusing on self-care maintenance (ie, medication adherence, physical activity, and diet control), self-care monitoring (ie, monitoring signs and symptoms), and self-care management (ie, consultations with health care providers). Positive self-care behaviors observed include the following: individuals trying to maintain good glycemic control during COVID-19 increased their medication adherence in 27% (10/36) of studies; and diet control improved in 50% (18/36) of studies. Negative self-care behaviors observed include the following: decline in physical activities and increased sedentariness were observed in 65% (23/36) of studies; poor diet control was observed in 57% (21/36) of studies; and self-monitoring of health status dropped in 43% (15/36) of studies. The use of technology to support self-care of chronic conditions during COVID-19 was reported in 72% (26/36) of studies. The actual use of telehealth in place of physical consultations during COVID-19 was observed in 50% (18/36) of studies, and other digital technologies (eg, social media apps, smartphone apps, web-based platforms, and web browsing) were used in 50% (18/36) of studies. Telehealth was discussed and recommended as the default technology in delivering future health care services during COVID-19 and beyond in 77% (28/36) of studies.

Conclusions: This review highlighted the necessity to rethink how models of self-care should continue to address the demands of chronic conditions while being responsive to the imminent threats of infectious diseases. Perhaps the silver lining of COVID-19 is that adoption of digital technology (especially telehealth) among a vast cross-section of people with chronic conditions is possible. Future research should investigate effective ways to incorporate evidence-based digital health tools into these new models of self-care that address the challenges of chronic and infectious conditions.

Keywords: COVID-19; chronic conditions; digital health; health technology; pandemic; self-care; self-management; technology; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness model based on three key concepts of self-care behavior [2].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of articles included at each stage of the screening process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bernell S, Howard SW. Use Your Words Carefully: What Is a Chronic Disease? Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 02;4:159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00159. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Strömberg A. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Advances in Nursing Science. 2012;35(3):194–204. doi: 10.1097/ans.0b013e318261b1ba. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harris MF, Zwar NA. Care of patients with chronic disease: the challenge for general practice. Med J Aust. 2007 Jul 16;187(2):104–7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01152.x.har10436_fm - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bavli I, Sutton B, Galea S. Harms of public health interventions against covid-19 must not be ignored. BMJ. 2020 Nov 02;371:m4074. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levene LS, Seidu S, Greenhalgh T, Khunti K. Pandemic threatens primary care for long term conditions. BMJ. 2020 Oct 05;371:m3793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3793. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources