Ethical considerations around volunteer payments in a malaria human infection study in Kenya: an embedded empirical ethics study
- PMID: 35443642
- PMCID: PMC9019790
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00783-y
Ethical considerations around volunteer payments in a malaria human infection study in Kenya: an embedded empirical ethics study
Abstract
Human Infection Studies (HIS) have emerged as an important research approach with the potential to fast track the global development of vaccines and treatments for infectious diseases, including in low resource settings. Given the high level of burdens involved in many HIS, particularly prolonged residency and biological sampling requirements, it can be challenging to identify levels of study payments that provide adequate compensation but avoid 'undue' levels of inducement to participate. Through this embedded ethics study, involving 97 healthy volunteers and other research stakeholders in a malaria HIS programme in Kenya, and using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and observations during and after a malaria HIS, we give a grounded account of ethical issues emerging in relation to study payments in this setting. While careful community, national, international scientific and ethics review processes meant that risks of serious harm were highly unlikely, the levels of motivation to join HIS seen could raise concerns about study payments being too high. Particular value was placed on the reliability, rather than level, of study payment in this setting, where subsistence livelihoods are common. Study volunteers were generally clear about the study aims at the point of recruitment, and this knowledge was retained over a year later, although most reported experiencing more burdens than anticipated at enrolment. Strict study screening procedures, regular clinical and laboratory monitoring of volunteers, with prompt treatment with antimalarial at predetermined endpoints suggested that the risks of serious harm were highly unlikely. Ethical concerns emerged in relation to volunteers' attempts to conceal symptoms, hoping to prolong residency periods and increase study payments; and volunteers making decisions that compromised important family relationships and personal values. Our findings support an interpretation that, although study volunteers were keen to join the study to access cash payments, they also paid attention to other features of the study and the general clinical research landscape, including levels of risk associated with study participation. Overall, our analysis shows that the ethical concerns emerging from the study payments can be addressed through practical measures, hinged on reducing burdens and strengthening communication, raising important issues for research policy and planning.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Understanding the benefits and burdens associated with a malaria human infection study in Kenya: experiences of study volunteers and other stakeholders.Trials. 2021 Jul 26;22(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05455-7. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34311781 Free PMC article.
-
Deliberately infecting healthy volunteers with malaria parasites: Perceptions and experiences of participants and other stakeholders in a Kenyan-based malaria infection study.Bioethics. 2020 Oct;34(8):819-832. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12781. Epub 2020 Jul 9. Bioethics. 2020. PMID: 32643809 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast.PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127842. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26010783 Free PMC article.
-
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143. J Int Bioethique. 2008. PMID: 18664007 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring the participant experience in controlled human infection model (CHIM) trials: A modified grounded theory study.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0328378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328378. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40768397 Free PMC article.
-
Human infection challenge in the pandemic era and beyond, HIC-Vac annual meeting report, 2022.Immunother Adv. 2023 Oct 31;3(1):ltad024. doi: 10.1093/immadv/ltad024. eCollection 2023. Immunother Adv. 2023. PMID: 38020312 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethics & utility of controlled human infection studies (CHIS) in low- & middle-income countries.Indian J Med Res. 2024 Sep&Oct;160(3&4):262-266. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_985_2024. Indian J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 39632640 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature.J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10191-x. Epub 2022 Jun 22. J Bioeth Inq. 2022. PMID: 35731331 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical