Clinical utility and prognostic implications of the novel 4S-AF scheme to characterize and evaluate patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry
- PMID: 35446354
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab280
Clinical utility and prognostic implications of the novel 4S-AF scheme to characterize and evaluate patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry
Abstract
Aims: The 4S-AF classification scheme comprises of four domains: stroke risk (St), symptoms (Sy), severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden (Sb), and substrate (Su). We sought to examine the implementation of the 4S-AF scheme in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry and compare outcomes in AF patients according to the 4S-AF-led decision-making process.
Methods and results: Atrial fibrillation patients from 250 centres across 27 European countries were included. A 4S-AF score was calculated as the sum of each domain with a maximum score of 9. Of 6321 patients, 8.4% had low (St), 47.5% EHRA I (Sy), 40.5% newly diagnosed or paroxysmal AF (Sb), and 5.1% no cardiovascular risk factors or left atrial enlargement (Su). Median follow-up was 24 months. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were (St) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 8.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-25.9], (Sb) (aHR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08-1.35), and (Su) (aHR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14-1.41). For CV mortality and any thromboembolic event, only (Su) (aHR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45-2.06) and (Sy) (aHR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.66) were statistically significant, respectively. None of the domains were independently linked to ischaemic stroke or major bleeding. Higher 4S-AF score was related to a significant increase in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, any thromboembolic event, and ischaemic stroke but not major bleeding. Treatment of all 4S-AF domains was associated with an independent decrease in all-cause mortality (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.92). For each 4S-AF domain left untreated, the risk of all-cause mortality increased substantially (aHR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.16-1.56).
Conclusion: Implementation of the novel 4S-AF scheme is feasible, and treatment decisions based on this scheme improve mortality rates in AF.
Keywords: 4S-AF; Atrial fibrillation; Bleeding; Characterization; Classification; EORP-AF registry; Mortality; Prognostic implications; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Validation.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- Abbott Vascular Int. (2011-21)
- Amgen Cardiovascular (2009-18)
- AstraZeneca (2014-21)
- Bayer (2009-18)
- Boehringer Ingelheim (2009-19)
- Boston Scientific (2009-12)
- The Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance (2011-16)
- The Alliance Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH and Eli Lilly and Company (2011-17)
- Edwards (2016-19)
- Gedeon Richter Plc. (2014-17)
- Menarini Int. Op. (2009-12)
- MSD-Merck & Co. (2011-14)
- Novartis Pharma AG (2014-20)
- ResMed (2014-16)
- Sanofi (2009-11)
- SERVIER (2010-21)
- Vifor (2019-22)
- Abbott Vascular Int.
- Amgen Cardiovascular
- AstraZeneca
- Bayer
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Boston Scientific
- The Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance
- The Alliance Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH and Eli Lilly and Company
- Gedeon Richter Plc.
- Menarini Int. Op.
- MSD-Merck & Co.
- Novartis Pharma AG
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical