Factors Influencing Telemedicine Use at a Northern New England Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- PMID: 35446680
- PMCID: PMC9287286
- DOI: 10.1200/OP.21.00750
Factors Influencing Telemedicine Use at a Northern New England Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize the use of telemedicine for oncology care over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Northern New England with a focus on factors affecting trends.
Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using patient visit data from electronic health records from hematology-oncology and radiation-oncology service lines spanning the local onset of the pandemic from March 18, 2020, through March 31, 2021. This period was subdivided into four phases designated as lockdown, transition, stabilization, and second wave. Generalized linear mixed regression models were used to estimate the effects of patient characteristics on trends for rates of telemedicine use across phases and the effects of visit type on patient satisfaction and postvisit ER or hospital admissions within 2 weeks.
Results: A total of 19,280 patients with 102,349 visits (13.1% audio-only and 1.4% video) were studied. Patient age (increased use in age < 45 and 85 years and older) and urban residence were associated with higher use of telemedicine, especially after initial lockdown. Recent cancer therapy, ER use, and hospital admissions in the past year were all associated with lower telemedicine utilization across pandemic phases. Provider clinical department corresponded to the largest differences in telemedicine use across all phases. ER and hospital admission rates in the 2 weeks after a telehealth visit were lower than those in in-person visits (0.7% v 1.3% and 1.2% v 2.7% for ER and hospital use, respectively; P < .001). Patient satisfaction did not vary across visit types.
Conclusion: Telemedicine use in oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic varied according to the phase and patient, medical, and health system factors, suggesting opportunities for standardization of care and need for attention to equitable telemedicine access.
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to
Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (
No potential conflicts of interest were reported.
Figures


References
-
- Doolittle GC, Allen A.Practising oncology via telemedicine J Telemed Telecare 363–701997 - PubMed
-
- Sabesan S.Medical models of teleoncology: Current status and future directions Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 10200–2042014 - PubMed
-
- Satcher RL, Bogler O, Hyle L, et al. Telemedicine and telesurgery in cancer care: Inaugural conference at MD Anderson Cancer Center J Surg Oncol 110353–3592014 - PubMed
-
- Larson JL, Rosen AB, Wilson FA.The effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Telemed J E Health 24397–4052018 - PubMed
-
- Patt D, Wilfong L, Kanipe K, et al. Telemedicine for cancer care: Implementation across a multicenter community oncology practice Am J Manag Care 26SP330–SP3322020 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous