Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0266801.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266801. eCollection 2022.

Gender role attitudes and father practices as predictors of nonresident father-child contact

Affiliations

Gender role attitudes and father practices as predictors of nonresident father-child contact

Marieke Heers et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Due to an increasing number of parental union dissolutions, a growing number of fathers does not cohabit with their biological children. This article analyses individual and societal gender role attitudes as well as societal father practices as determinants of nonresident father-child contact. Previous research shows that individual-level factors influence the relationship between nonresident fathers and their children. Research on resident fathers indicates that individual attitudes and societal contexts affect father-child involvement. Little is known on the relationship between individual gender role attitudes as well as societal gender role attitudes and father practices and nonresident fathers' involvement in their children's lives. To shed more light thereon, we examine data from eleven Eastern and Western European countries from the first wave of the Gender and Generations Survey. We analyze two samples: One consisting of nonresident fathers of children aged 0 to 13 and one of fathers of adolescents aged 14 to 17. Logistic regression models assess if individual and societal gender role attitudes as well as societal father practices predict the probability of monthly father-child contact. Contact between nonresident fathers is affected by different factors depending on whether the focus is on children or adolescents. Societal gender role attitudes and societal father practices predict the probability of monthly contact between fathers and their children; individual gender role attitudes are less important. Individual gender role attitudes, on the other hand, predict the probability of monthly contact between nonresident fathers and their adolescent children; societal factors matter less for this age group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of societal gender ideologies and societal father practices, by country.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rendall MS, Joshi H, Oh J, Verropoulou G. Comparing the Childrearing Lifetimes of Britain’s Divorce-Revolution Men and Women. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie. 2001;17(4):365–88. doi: 10.1023/a:1012555916990 - DOI
    1. Sorensen E, Mincy R, Halpern A. Redirecting Welfare Policy toward Building Strong Families. Strengthening Families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 2000.
    1. Régnier-Loilier A. When fathers lose touch with their children after a separation. Population & Societies. 2013;500:1–4.
    1. Köppen K, Kreyenfeld M, Trappe H. Loose Ties? Determinants of Father–Child Contact After Separation in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2018;80(5):1163–75. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12504 - DOI
    1. OECD. OECD Family Database. 2018.

Publication types