Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Mar 28;7(6):953-962.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006716.

Efficacy of combined immunosuppression with or without eltrombopag in children with newly diagnosed aplastic anemia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of combined immunosuppression with or without eltrombopag in children with newly diagnosed aplastic anemia

Olga Goronkova et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

We compared the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag (ELTR) combined with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and IST alone in treatment-naïve children with severe (SAA) and very severe (vSAA) aplastic anemia. Ninety-eight pediatric patients were randomized to receive horse antithymocyte globulin (hATG) and cyclosporin A (CsA) with (n = 49) or without (n = 49) ELTR. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) at 4 months. After 4 months, nonresponders were crossed over to the alternative group. In all patients, the ORR in ELTR + IST and IST groups was similar (65% vs 53%; P = .218); however, the complete response (CR) rate was significantly higher in the ELTR + IST group (31% vs 12%; P = .027). In severity subgroups, the ORR was 89% vs 57% (P = .028) in favor of IST + ELTR in SAA, but it did not differ in patients with vSAA (52% vs 50%; P = .902). At 6 months after the crossover, 61% of initial ELTR(-) patients achieved a response compared with 17% of initial ELTR(+) patients (P = .016). No significant difference in ELTR + IST and IST groups was observed in the 3-year overall survival (OS) (89% vs 91%; P = .673) or the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) (53% vs 41%; P = .326). There was no unexpected toxicity related to ELTR. Adding ELTR to standard IST was well tolerated and increased the CR rate. The greatest benefit from ELTR combined with IST was observed in patients with SAA but not in those with vSAA. The second course of IST resulted in a high ORR in initial ELTR(-) patients who added ELTR and had limited efficacy among patients who received ELTR upfront. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03413306.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.M. received lecturer’s fees from Novartis. M.M. received lecturer’s fees from Miltenyi Biotec. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cumulative incidence of hematologic response by treatment group and depending on theseverity ofAA. (A) Cumulative incidence of OR by treatment group. (B) Cumulative incidence of CR by treatment group. (C) Cumulative incidence of OR in SAA (ANC ≥0.2 × 109/L) patients by treatment group. (D) Cumulative incidence of OR in vSAA (ANC <0.2 × 109/L) patients by treatment group. Shaded areas are 95% CIs. Competing events included death. The start of the second-line treatment with hATG/CsA ± ELTR and HSCT was considered censoring. P values are given for the 4-month point. The cumulative incidence of the overall response at 4 months was 65% (95% CI, 52-79) in the ELTR + IST group and 54% (95% CI, 40-69) in the IST group (A). The cumulative incidences for complete response at 4 months were 31% (95% CI, 18-44) and 13% (95% CI, 3-22), respectively (B). The cumulative incidence of the overall response at 4 months in patients with SAA (ANC ≥0.2 × 109/L) was 89% (95% CI, 89-100) in the ELTR + IST group and 57% (95% CI, 35-79) in the IST group (C). The cumulative incidence of the overall response at 4 months in patients with vSAA (ANC <0.2 × 109/L) was 52% (95% CI, 34-70) and 52% (95% CI, 33-72) (D).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
OS, EFS, and cumulative incidence of relapse of patients with SAA by treatment group.

References

    1. Young NS. Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2013;2013:76–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartung HD, Olson TS, Bessler M. Acquired aplastic anemia in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(6):1311–1336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoshida N, Kobayashi R, Yabe H, et al. First-line treatment for severe aplastic anemia in children: bone marrow transplantation from a matched family donor versus immunosuppressive therapy. Haematologica. 2014;99(12):1784–1791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dufour C, Pillon M, Sociè G, et al. Outcome of aplastic anaemia in children. A study by the severe aplastic anaemia and paediatric disease working parties of the European group blood and bone marrow transplant. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(4):565–573. - PubMed
    1. Bacigalupo A. How I treat acquired aplastic anemia. Blood. 2017;129(11):1428–1436. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data