Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 22;9(4):129.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9040129.

Effectiveness of Platform-Based Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal or Neurologic Injuries: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of Platform-Based Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal or Neurologic Injuries: A Systematic Review

Anil Babu Payedimarri et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

During the last ten years the use of robotic-assisted rehabilitation has increased significantly. Compared with traditional care, robotic rehabilitation has several potential advantages. Platform-based robotic rehabilitation can help patients recover from musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Evidence on how platform-based robotic technologies can positively impact on disability recovery is still lacking, and it is unclear which intervention is most effective in individual cases. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of platform-based robotic rehabilitation for individuals with musculoskeletal or neurological injuries. Thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria and evaluated the efficacy of platform-based rehabilitation robots. Our findings showed that rehabilitation with platform-based robots produced some encouraging results. Among the platform-based robots studied, the VR-based Rutgers Ankle and the Hunova were found to be the most effective robots for the rehabilitation of patients with neurological conditions (stroke, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease) and various musculoskeletal ankle injuries. Our results were drawn mainly from studies with low-level evidence, and we think that our conclusions should be taken with caution to some extent and that further studies are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of platform-based robotic rehabilitation devices.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; clinical effectiveness; neurorehabilitation; orthopedic rehabilitation; platform-based robotic rehabilitation; robot-assisted training; spinal cord injuries; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow diagram of the records selection process.

References

    1. Loureiro R.C.V., Harwin W.S., Nagai K. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: A technology push. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2011;49:1103–1118. doi: 10.1007/s11517-011-0797-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Péter O., Fazekas G., Zsiga K. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy: Review and recommendations for future clinical trials. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 2011;34:196–202. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328346e8ad. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpe B.T., Krebs H.I., Hogan N. Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2001;14:745–752. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200112000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosecker C., Dipietro L., Volpe B. Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients with Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair. 2010;24:62–69. doi: 10.1177/1545968309343214. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krebs H., Hogan N., Aisen M. Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 1998;6:75–87. doi: 10.1109/86.662623. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources