Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 7;9(4):165.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9040165.

Heart Rate Variability Analysis for Seizure Detection in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Affiliations

Heart Rate Variability Analysis for Seizure Detection in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Benedetta Olmi et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

In Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), the early detection of neonatal seizures is of utmost importance for a timely clinical intervention. Over the years, several neonatal seizure detection systems were proposed to detect neonatal seizures automatically and speed up seizure diagnosis, most based on the EEG signal analysis. Recently, research has focused on other possible seizure markers, such as electrocardiography (ECG). This work proposes an ECG-based NSD system to investigate the usefulness of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis to detect neonatal seizures in the NICUs. HRV analysis is performed considering time-domain, frequency-domain, entropy and multiscale entropy features. The performance is evaluated on a dataset of ECG signals from 51 full-term babies, 29 seizure-free. The proposed system gives results comparable to those reported in the literature: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve = 62%, Sensitivity = 47%, Specificity = 67%. Moreover, the system's performance is evaluated in a real clinical environment, inevitably affected by several artefacts. To the best of our knowledge, our study proposes for the first time a multi-feature ECG-based NSD system that also offers a comparative analysis between babies suffering from seizures and seizure-free ones.

Keywords: ECG; HRV; NICU; multiscale entropy; neonatal seizures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram showing seizure events’ duration and seizure events’ occurrence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unbalanced data in the experiments based on the segmentation of the ECG signal into the 60 s (A) and 180 s (B) epochs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of the epoch-based metrics: comparison between the labeling made by the expert (A) and the time-windows classified by the system (B). In this example, the detector finds two false positive (FP), five false negative (FN), three true positive and five true negative (TN) values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of the event-based metrics: comparison between the labeling made by the expert (A) and the time-windows classified by the system (B). An event is considered as correctly identified if the system detects at least one epoch during the event. In this example, the first two events are correctly identified, while the third one is not identified.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of the time delay metric: comparison between the labeling made by the expert (A) and the time-windows classified by the system (B). The time delay describes the time interval between the seizure detected by the algorithm and the seizure onset marked by the expert.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The features ranked with the mRMR algorithm for the experiment based on 180 s segmentation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Schematic representation of the Sensitivity values for the 22 pathological patients, iteratively obtained by the Linear SVM model trained on the full set of features during the LOSO cross-validation. A total of 10 out of 22 pathological patients are characterized by Sensitivity values >0. (B) Schematic representation of the Sensitivity values for the 22 pathological patients, iteratively obtained by the Linear SVM model trained on the subset of two features selected through the mRMR algorithm during the LOSO cross-validation. A total of 7 out of 22 pathological patients are characterized by Sensitivity values >0.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(A) Schematic representation of the Sensitivity values for the 22 pathological patients, iteratively obtained by the Gaussian SVM model trained on the full set of features during the LOSO cross-validation. A total of 15 out of 22 pathological patients are characterized by Sensitivity values >0. (B) Schematic representation of the Sensitivity values for the 22 pathological patients, iteratively obtained by the Gaussian SVM model trained on the subset of two features selected through the mRMR algorithm during the LOSO cross-validation. A total of 17 out of 22 pathological patients are characterized by Sensitivity values >0.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The concatenated ROC evaluated on the SVM Gaussian kernel-based system with highest AUC. All the recordings are linked together into a single recording.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pisani F., Spagnoli C., Falsaperla R., Nagarajan L., Ramantani G. Seizures in the neonate: A review of etiologies and outcomes. Seizure. 2021;85:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.12.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramantani G. Neonatal epilepsy and underlying aetiology: To what extent do seizures and EEG abnormalities influence outcome? Epileptic Disord. 2013;15:365–375. doi: 10.1684/epd.2013.0619. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apers W.M.J., de Vries L.S., Groenendaal F., Toet M.C., Weeke L.C. Delay in treatment of neonatal seizures: A retrospective cohort study. Neonatology. 2020;117:599–605. doi: 10.1159/000509282. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pressler R.M., Lagae L. Why we urgently improved seizure and epilepsy therapies for children and neonates. Neuropharmacology. 2020;170:107854. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107854. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shellhaas R.A., Chang T., Tsuchida T., Scher M.S., Riviello J.J., Abend N.S., Nguyen S., Wusthoff C.J., Clancy R.R. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Guideline on Continuous Electroencephalography Monitoring in Neonates. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. Off. Publ. Am. Electroencephalogr. Soc. 2011;28:611–617. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31823e96d7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources