Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 11;9(4):171.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9040171.

Novel Techniques and Future Perspective for Investigating Critical-Size Bone Defects

Affiliations
Review

Novel Techniques and Future Perspective for Investigating Critical-Size Bone Defects

Elijah Ejun Huang et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

A critical-size bone defect is a challenging clinical problem in which a gap between bone ends will not heal and will become a nonunion. The current treatment is to harvest and transplant an autologous bone graft to facilitate bone bridging. To develop less invasive but equally effective treatment options, one needs to first have a comprehensive understanding of the bone healing process. Therefore, it is imperative to leverage the most advanced technologies to elucidate the fundamental concepts of the bone healing process and develop innovative therapeutic strategies to bridge the nonunion gap. In this review, we first discuss the current animal models to study critical-size bone defects. Then, we focus on four novel analytic techniques and discuss their strengths and limitations. These four technologies are mass cytometry (CyTOF) for enhanced cellular analysis, imaging mass cytometry (IMC) for enhanced tissue special imaging, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) for detailed transcriptome analysis, and Luminex assays for comprehensive protein secretome analysis. With this new understanding of the healing of critical-size bone defects, novel methods of diagnosis and treatment will emerge.

Keywords: CyTOF; Luminex; critical-size bone defect; imaging mass cytometry (IMC); mass cytometry; scRNA-seq.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Novel techniques for investigating critical-size bone defects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SPADE tree with contour viSNE plots to show heterogeneity of different cell populations within the critical-size bone defect site.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IMC imaging on human synovial membrane sample. Seven markers from a 30-marker panel were shown in the image. Magenta: α-Smooth muscle actin (α-SMA); Yellow: CD31; Lime: CD206; Red: iNOS; Cyan: CD20; White: CD3; Blue: Histone H3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collaborators G.B.D.F. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2:e580–e592. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quan K., Xu Q., Zhu M., Liu X., Dai M. Analysis of Risk Factors for Non-union After Surgery for Limb Fractures: A Case-Control Study of 669 Subjects. Front. Surg. 2021;8:754150. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.754150. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huber F.G. Surgical treatment of orthopaedic trauma. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care. 2007;63:450. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318124a95c. - DOI
    1. Hak D.J., Fitzpatrick D., Bishop J.A., Marsh J.L., Tilp S., Schnettler R., Simpson H., Alt V. Delayed union and nonunions: Epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects. Injury. 2014;45((Suppl. S2)):S3–S7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekegren C.L., Edwards E.R., de Steiger R., Gabbe B.J. Incidence, Costs and Predictors of Non-Union, Delayed Union and Mal-Union Following Long Bone Fracture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:2845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122845. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources