Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):216.
doi: 10.3390/bios12040216.

Near-Infrared Transflectance Spectroscopy Discriminates Solutions Containing Two Commercial Formulations of Botulinum Toxin Type A Diluted at Recommended Volumes for Clinical Reconstitution

Affiliations

Near-Infrared Transflectance Spectroscopy Discriminates Solutions Containing Two Commercial Formulations of Botulinum Toxin Type A Diluted at Recommended Volumes for Clinical Reconstitution

Antonio Currà et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is the active substance in pharmaceutical preparations widely used worldwide for the highly effective treatment of various disorders. Among the three commercial formulations of BoNT-A currently available in Italy for neurological indications, abobotulinum A toxin (Dysport®, Ipsen SpA, Milano, Italy) and incobotulinum A toxin (Xeomin®, Merz Pharma Italia srl, Milano, Italy) differ in the content of neurotoxin, non-toxic protein, and excipients. Clinical applications of BoNT-A adopt extremely diluted solutions (10-6 mg/mL) for injection in the target body district. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and chemometrics allow rapid, non-invasive, and non-destructive methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis. No data are available to date on the chemometric analysis of the spectral fingerprints acquired from the diluted commercial formulations of BoNT-A. In this proof-of-concept study, we tested whether NIRS can categorize solutions of incobotulinum A toxin (lacking non-toxic proteins) and abobotulinum A toxin (containing non-toxic proteins). Distinct excipients in the two formulations were also analyzed. We acquired transmittance spectra in the visible and short-wave infrared regions (350-2500 nm) by an ASD FieldSpec 4™ Standard-Res Spectrophotoradiometer, using a submerged dip probe designed to read spectra in transflectance mode from liquid samples. After preliminary spectra pre-processing, principal component analysis was applied to characterize the spectral features of the two BoNT-A solutions and those of the various excipients diluted according to clinical standards. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis was used to implement a classification model able to discriminate the BoNT-A solutions and excipients. NIRS distinguished solutions containing distinct BoNT-A commercial formulations (abobotulinum A toxin vs. incobotulinum A toxin) diluted at recommended volumes for clinical reconstitution, distinct proteins (HSA vs. incobotulinum A toxin), very diluted solutions of simple sugars (lactose vs. sucrose), and saline or water. Predictive models of botulinum toxin formulations were also performed with the highest precision and accuracy.

Keywords: NIR spectroscopy; botulinum neurotoxin type A; chemometrics; partial least squares-discriminant analysis; transflectance spectroscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representations of the utilized spectrophotometer (left) and the experimental set-up (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for solutions of incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), abobotulinum A toxin (abo400alb01lat2), HSA (alb1), sucrose (sacc46), lactose (lact1), saline (NaC09), and water (AD). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 and PC2 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), equiactive abobotulinum A toxin (abo400alb01lat2), HSA (alb1), sucrose (sacc46), lactose (lact1), saline (NaC09), and water (AD).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46) and abobotulinum A toxin (abo100alb0025lat05), and their excipients (EccInco, EccAbo). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 and PC2 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), abobotulinum A toxin (abo100alb0025lat05), and their excipients (EccInco, EccAbo).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46) and equiactive abobotulinum A toxin (abo400alb01lat2), and their excipients (EccInco, EccAbo). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 and PC2 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), equiactive abobotulinum A toxin (abo400alb01lat2), and their excipients (EccInco, EccAbo).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for abobotulinum A toxin at standard clinical dilutions (abo100alb0025lat05), and its excipients (EccAbo). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for abobotulinum A toxin at standard clinical dilutions (abo100alb0025lat05), and its excipients (EccAbo).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), and its excipients (EccInco). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), and its excipients (EccInco).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), and equiactive abobotulinum A toxin (abo400alb01lat2). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), and equiactive Abobotulinum A toxin (abo400alb01lat2).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46) and abobotulinum A toxin (abo100alb0025lat05). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), abobotulinum A toxin (abo100alb0025lat05).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), and HSA (alb1). Scores on PC1 vs. PC2 (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for incobotulinum A toxin (inco100alb1sac46), and HSA (alb1).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for sucrose (sacc46), and lactose (lact1). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for sucrose (sacc46), and lactose (lact1).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Average raw (a) and pre-processed (b) transmittance spectra for saline (NaC09), and water (AD). PC1−PC2 score plot (c) and loading plot of PC1 (d) for saline (NaC09), and water (AD).
Figure 12
Figure 12
Positions of the discrimination boundary as determined by PLS−DA model (utilized wavelength range: 800−2400 nm) for the two classes: abobotulinum A toxin (a) and incobotulinum A toxin (b).
Figure 13
Figure 13
VIP scores determined from PLS−DA model for the two classes of abobotulinum A toxin (VIP scores for Y1) and incobotulinum A toxin (VIP scores for Y2).
Figure 14
Figure 14
Positions of the discrimination boundary as determined by PLS−DA model (utilized wavelength ranges: 811–991 nm, 1018–1111 nm, 1352–1414 nm, 1527–1722 nm) for the two classes: abobotulinum A toxin (a) and incobotulinum A toxin (b).
Figure 15
Figure 15
Molecular structure of BoNT-A complex reconstructed by fitting the three-dimensional structures of the BoNT-A and neurotoxin-binding protein (NTNHA) and HA70-HA-17-HA33 complex modules into the electron microscopy image. (Adapted with permission from Ref. [25]. Copyright 2013 Lee et al.).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnson E.A., Bradshaw M. Clostridium botulinum and its neurotoxins: A metabolic and cellular perspective. Toxicon. 2001;39:1703–1722. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00157-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh M., Dutta S.R., Passi D., Singh P., Sharma S., Sharma A. Botulinum toxin the poison that heals: A brief review. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2016;7:10–16. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.196133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frevert J. Content of botulinum neurotoxin in botox®/vistabel®, dysport®/azzalure®, and xeomin®/bocouture®. Drugs R D. 2010;10:67–73. doi: 10.2165/11584780-000000000-00000. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnon S.S., Schechter R., Inglesby T.V., Henderson D.A., Bartlett J.G., Ascher M.S., Eitzen E., Fine A.D., Hauer J., Layton M. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: Medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001;285:1059–1070. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.8.1059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rummel A., Mahrhold S., Bigalke H., Binz T. The HCC-domain of botulinum neurotoxins A and B exhibits a singular ganglioside binding site displaying serotype specific carbohydrate interaction. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;51:631–643. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03872.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms