Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):527.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07845-2.

Clinical variation in the organization of clinical pathways in esophagogastric cancer, a mixed method multiple case study

Affiliations

Clinical variation in the organization of clinical pathways in esophagogastric cancer, a mixed method multiple case study

J C H B M Luijten et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Among esophagogastric cancer patients, the probability of having undergone treatment with curative intent has been shown to vary, depending on the hospital of diagnosis. However, little is known about the factors that contribute to this variation. In this study, we sought to understand the organization of clinical pathways and their association with variation in practice.

Methods: A mixed-method study using quantitative and qualitative data was conducted. Quantitative data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (e.g., outpatient clinic consultations and diagnostic procedures). For qualitative data, thematic content analysis was performed using semi-structured interviews (n = 30), observations of outpatient clinic consultations (n = 26), and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM, n = 16) in eight hospitals, to assess clinicians' perspectives regarding the clinical pathways.

Results: Quantitative analyses showed that patients more often underwent surgical consultation prior to the MDTM in hospitals associated with a high probability of receiving treatment with curative intent, but more often consulted with a geriatrician in hospitals associated with a low probability of such treatment. The organization of clinical pathways was analyzed quantitatively at three levels: regional, local, and patient levels. At a regional level, hospitals differed in terms of the number of patients discussed during the MDTM. At the local level, the revision of radiological images and restaging after neoadjuvant treatment varied. At the patient level, some hospitals routinely conduct fitness tests, whereas others estimated the patient's physical fitness during an outpatient clinic consultation. Few clinicians performed a standard geriatric consultation in older patients to assess their mental fitness and frailty.

Conclusion: Surgical consultation prior to MDTM was more often conducted in hospitals associated with a high probability of receiving treatment with curative intent, whereas a geriatrician was consulted more often in hospitals associated with a low probability of receiving such treatment.

Keywords: Cancer medicine; Esophageal cancer; Gastric cancer; Variation in clinical pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PS: Research support or funding: EndoStim, Pentax, Norgine, Motus GI and The Enose company Advisory Board: Motus GIE.

HvL: Consultant or advisory role: BMS, Lilly, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Servier, Research funding and/or medication supply: Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Philips, Roche, Servier.

RV: received research grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

For the remaining authors no conflicts of interest were declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Parts of an integrated clinical pathway according to the hospital of diagnosis on regional, local and patient level. Based on the observations all hospitals are displayed in this figure. Each included hospital is represented by the form of a circle including a hospital number. In addition the probability groups are represented by different shades of gray. The referring hospital is not represented in this figure

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen, Type: Landelijke richtlijn Oesophaguscarcinoom. May, 1 2015. Available at: www.oncoline.nl/oesofaguscarcinoom. Accessed: 25 Nov 2019.
    1. Landelijke werkgroep Gastro-intestinale Tumoren, Type: Landelijke richtlijn. Landelijke richtlijn Maagcarcinoom. March 1. 2017 Available at: https://www.oncoline.nl/maagcarcinoom. Accessed 25 Nov 2019. .
    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v38–v49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw350. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannova R, Arnold D, Committee EG. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v50–v57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw329. - DOI - PubMed