Key stakeholders' views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions' education: a qualitative study
- PMID: 35449105
- PMCID: PMC9026974
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z
Key stakeholders' views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions' education: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Patients and the public have an integral role in educating healthcare professionals. Authentic partnerships between higher education institutions and patients and the public are essential. This study examined key stakeholders' views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement (PPI) including the nature of the involvement and requirements for partnership.
Methods: Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit key stakeholders, including patients and members of the public involved in health professions education, and academics interested in PPI. Focus groups were held with patient and public participants, providing the opportunity to gain multiple perspectives in an interactive group setting. Academics with an interest in PPI were interviewed using a semi-structured approach. Topic guides were derived from the literature and piloted prior to data collection. Focus groups and interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. All data was audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and thematically analysed.
Results: Four focus groups were conducted involving 23 patient and public participants (median number of participants per focus group of 6). Nine interviews were conducted with academics (face-to-face [n = 8] or by telephone [n = 1]). Five themes were developed: previous experiences of PPI, training requirements, challenges/barriers to PPI, facilitators of PPI and future ideas for PPI. All participants held positive views of the value of PPI. Participants had mixed views in terms of training, which depended on the level of involvement, but similar views on the challenges and facilitators for PPI in education. There was agreement that PPI requires institutional vision and investment to build strong relationships and a culture of PPI best practice.
Conclusions: There is a need for more strategic and formal involvement of patients and the public to ensure that that PPI becomes sustainably embedded in health professions education.
Keywords: Health professions education; Patient Educator; Patient Partner; Patient and public involvement.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis.Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1844-1860. doi: 10.1111/hex.13529. Epub 2022 Jun 3. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 35657162 Free PMC article.
-
Embedding formal and experiential public and patient involvement training in a structured PhD programme: process and impact evaluation.Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 24;9(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00516-4. Res Involv Engagem. 2023. PMID: 37996882 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study.Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13967. doi: 10.1111/hex.13967. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39102667 Free PMC article.
-
A proposal to embed patient and public involvement within qualitative data collection and analysis phases of a primary care based implementation study.Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 31;9(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00440-7. Res Involv Engagem. 2023. PMID: 37259130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient and public involvement in basic and clinical psychiatric research: a scoping review of reviews.BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06608-7. BMC Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40133899 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Incorporating Community Member Perspectives to Inform a Resident Health Equity Curriculum.J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Dec;15(6):718-725. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00373.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 38045947 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Transformative Potential of Learning Analytics in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2025 Jan 1;13(1):12-24. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.103973.2034. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2025. PMID: 39906079 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Practical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Nov 27;10:e60031. doi: 10.2196/60031. JMIR Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39602211 Free PMC article.
-
The pedagogical liminality of patient and public involvement in initial healthcare professional education: an umbrella review.Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 19;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00704-4. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40390072 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transforming the Medical School Admissions Process: Prioritizing Team-Based Skills and Patient-Centered Values.J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Dec 18;11:23821205241307764. doi: 10.1177/23821205241307764. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024. PMID: 39703537 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The Programmed Patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ. 1964;39:802–5. - PubMed
-
- Tew J, Gell C, Foster S. Learning from Experience Involving service users and carers in mental health education and training: a good practice guide. 2004; 53.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources