Less Is More: A Narrative Review of Deciding When Surgical Intervention Should Be Withheld
- PMID: 35449641
- PMCID: PMC9013421
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23285
Less Is More: A Narrative Review of Deciding When Surgical Intervention Should Be Withheld
Abstract
Decision-making in surgery is one of the great unspoken challenges, an important but markedly challenging skill that takes a lifetime to master. The choice not to operate generally proves a significantly harder conclusion than opting for intervention. Our paper explores the influences which affect a clinician's decision to operate or not. The challenging situation where patient and clinician disagree on proposed management is also explored. Implications on management are discussed, with constructive communication techniques offered, including the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: conservative management; multidisciplinary decision-making; obst gynec; patient-centred care; surgery.
Copyright © 2022, Stout et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Psychooncology. 2006;15:9–19. - PubMed
-
- Shared decision-making in acute surgical illness: the surgeon's perspective. Morris RS, Ruck JM, Conca-Cheng AM, Smith TJ, Carver TW, Johnston FM. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:784–795. - PubMed