Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 5:3:880615.
doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.880615. eCollection 2022.

Training in Ultrasound to Determine Gestational Age (TUDA): Evaluation of a Novel Education Package to Teach Ultrasound-Naive Midwives Basic Obstetric Ultrasound in Malawi

Alexandra C Viner  1 , Gladys Membe-Gadama  2 , Sonia Whyte  3 , Doris Kayambo  4 , Martha Masamba  2 , Enita Makwakwa  5 , David Lissauer  6   7 , Sarah J Stock  8 , Jane E Norman  9 , Rebecca M Reynolds  10 , Brian Magowan  11 , Bridget Freyne  12 , Luis Gadama  2
Affiliations

Training in Ultrasound to Determine Gestational Age (TUDA): Evaluation of a Novel Education Package to Teach Ultrasound-Naive Midwives Basic Obstetric Ultrasound in Malawi

Alexandra C Viner et al. Front Glob Womens Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Although ultrasound to determine gestational age is fundamental to the optimum management of pregnancy and is recommended for all women by the World Health Organisation, it remains unavailable to many women in low-income countries where trained practitioners are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate a novel, context-specific education package to teach midwives basic obstetric ultrasound, including the determination of gestational age by measurement of fetal femur length.

Methods: The study was conducted across six sites in Malawi in January 2021. Following a virtual "training of the trainers", local teams delivered a 10-day programme encompassing both didactic and "hands on" components. Matched pre and post course tests assessed participants' knowledge of key concepts, with Objective Structured Clinical Examinations used to evaluate practical skills. To achieve a pass, trainees were required to establish the gestational age to within ±7 days of an experienced practitioner and achieve an overall score of >65% on five consecutive occasions. A matched pre and post course survey explored participants' attitudes and confidence in performing ultrasound examinations.

Results: Of the 29 midwives who participated, 28 finished the programme and met the criteria specified to pass. 22 midwives completed the matched knowledge tests, with the mean (SD) score increasing from 10.2 (3.3) to 18 (2.5) after training (P <0.0001). Mean difference 7.9, 95% CI 6.5-9.2. Midwives passed 87% of the Observed Structured Clinical Examinations, establishing the gestational age to within ±7 days of an experienced practitioner in 89% of assessments. Beliefs regarding the importance of antenatal ultrasound increased post course (p = 0.02), as did confidence in performing ultrasound examinations (p <0.0001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates not only that ultrasound-naive practitioners can be taught to perform basic obstetric ultrasound dating scans, confidently and competently, after 10 days of training, but also that local teams can be orientated to successfully deliver the programme virtually. Previous ultrasound training initiatives, while often more comprehensive in their syllabus, have been of considerably longer duration and this is likely to be a barrier to upscaling opportunities. We propose that this focused training increases the potential for widescale and sustainable implementation.

Keywords: Malawi; gestational age; midwives; training; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart depicting methodology of trainee assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland Altman plot of comparison between the gestational ages assigned by the trainees vs the trainers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vogel JP, Oladapo OT, Manu A, Gülmezoglu AM, Bahl R. New WHO recommendations to improve the outcomes of preterm birth. Lancet Glob Heal. (2015) 3:e589–90. 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00183-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee ACC, Blencowe H, Lawn JE. Small babies, big numbers: global estimates of preterm birth. Lancet. (2019) 7:e2–3. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30484-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The World Health Organization (WHO) . Every Newborn Progress Report May 2015. Geneva: (2015).
    1. Pettker CM, Goldberg JD, El-Sayed YY. Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion (2017).
    1. Loughna P, Chitty L, Evans T, Chudleigh T. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound. (2009) 17:161–7. 10.1179/174313409X448543 - DOI