Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jul;82(1):115-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Silke Gillessen  1 Andrew Armstrong  2 Gert Attard  3 Tomasz M Beer  4 Himisha Beltran  5 Anders Bjartell  6 Alberto Bossi  7 Alberto Briganti  8 Robert G Bristow  9 Muhammad Bulbul  10 Orazio Caffo  11 Kim N Chi  12 Caroline S Clarke  13 Noel Clarke  14 Ian D Davis  15 Johann S de Bono  16 Ignacio Duran  17 Ros Eeles  16 Eleni Efstathiou  18 Jason Efstathiou  19 Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke  20 Christopher P Evans  21 Stefano Fanti  22 Felix Y Feng  23 Karim Fizazi  24 Mark Frydenberg  25 Dan George  26 Martin Gleave  27 Susan Halabi  28 Daniel Heinrich  29 Celesta Higano  30 Michael S Hofman  31 Maha Hussain  32 Nick James  16 Robert Jones  33 Ravindran Kanesvaran  34 Raja B Khauli  35 Laurence Klotz  36 Raya Leibowitz  37 Chris Logothetis  38 Fernando Maluf  39 Robin Millman  40 Alicia K Morgans  5 Michael J Morris  41 Nicolas Mottet  42 Hind Mrabti  43 Declan G Murphy  44 Vedang Murthy  45 William K Oh  46 Piet Ost  47 Joe M O'Sullivan  48 Anwar R Padhani  49 Chris Parker  16 Darren M C Poon  50 Colin C Pritchard  51 Danny M Rabah  52 Dana Rathkopf  41 Rob E Reiter  53 Mark Rubin  54 Charles J Ryan  55 Fred Saad  56 Juan P Sade  57 Oliver Sartor  58 Howard I Scher  59 Neal Shore  60 Iwona Skoneczna  61 Eric Small  23 Matthew Smith  62 Howard Soule  63 Daniel E Spratt  64 Cora N Sternberg  65 Hiroyoshi Suzuki  66 Christopher Sweeney  5 Matthew R Sydes  67 Mary-Ellen Taplin  5 Derya Tilki  68 Bertrand Tombal  69 Levent Türkeri  70 Hiroji Uemura  71 Hirotsugu Uemura  72 Inge van Oort  73 Kosj Yamoah  74 Dingwei Ye  75 Almudena Zapatero  76 Aurelius Omlin  77
Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Silke Gillessen et al. Eur Urol. 2022 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence.

Objective: To present the voting results from APCCC 2021.

Design, setting, and participants: The experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process.

Results and limitations: The voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material.

Conclusions: These voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Enrolment in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2021 once again identified salient questions that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.

Patient summary: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference is a forum for discussing current diagnosis and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. An expert panel votes on predefined questions focused on the most clinically relevant areas for treatment of advanced prostate cancer for which there are gaps in knowledge. The voting results provide a practical guide to help clinicians in discussing treatment options with patients as part of shared decision-making.

Keywords: (177)Lu-PSMA therapy; Advanced prostate cancer; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Genetics; Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; Imaging; Next-generation sequencing; PARP inhibition; Prostate cancer treatment; Tumour genomic profiling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types