Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;19(9):1489-1497.
doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-584OC.

Multiple-Breath Washout Outcome Measures in Adults with Bronchiectasis

Affiliations

Multiple-Breath Washout Outcome Measures in Adults with Bronchiectasis

Katherine O'Neill et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Rationale: Lung clearance index (LCI) has good intravisit repeatability with better sensitivity in detecting lung disease on computed tomography scan compared with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in adults with bronchiectasis. Alternative multiple-breath washout parameters have not been systematically studied in bronchiectasis. Objectives: To determine the validity, repeatability, sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of standard LCI (LCI2.5), shortened LCI (LCI5.0), ventilation heterogeneity arising within proximal conducting airways (ScondVT), and ventilation heterogeneity arising within the acinar airways (SacinVT) in a cross-sectional observational cohort of adults with bronchiectasis. Methods: Cross-sectional multiple-breath nitrogen washout data (Exhalyzer D; Eco Medics AG) from 132 patients with bronchiectasis across five United Kingdom centers (BronchUK Clinimetrics study) and 88 healthy control subjects were analyzed. Results: Within-test repeatability (mean coefficient of variation) was <5% for both LCI2.5 and LCI5.0 in patients with bronchiectasis, and there was no difference in mean coefficient of variation for LCI2.5 and LCI5.0 in patients with bronchiectasis compared with healthy volunteers. Moderate-strength correlations were seen between FEV1 and LCI2.5 (r = -0.54), LCI5.0 (r = -0.53), ScondVT (r = -0.35), and SacinVT (r = -0.38) z-scores. The proportion of subjects with abnormal multiple-breath washout (z-score > 2) but in normal FEV1 (z-score < -2) was 42% (LCI2.5) and 36% (LCI5.0). Overall results from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that LCI2.5 had the greatest combined sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between bronchiectasis and control subjects, followed by LCI5.0, FEV1, and ScondVT z-scores. There was a 57% time saving with LCI5.0. Conclusions: LCI2.5 and LCI5.0 had good within-test repeatability and superior sensitivity compared with spirometry measures in differentiating between health and bronchiectasis disease. LCI5.0 is quicker and more feasible than LCI2.5. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02468271).

Keywords: bronchiectasis; lung function; multiple breath washout.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Relationship between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and standard lung clearance index (LCI 2.5) z-scores. Dotted lines indicate FEV1 LLN and LCI 2.5 ULN. Percentage indicates proportion in each quadrant. (B) Relationship between FEV1 and shortened lung clearance index (LCI 5.0) z-scores. Dotted lines indicate FEV1 LLN and LCI 5.0 ULN. Percentage indicates proportion in each quadrant. CI = confidence interval; LLN = lower limit of normal; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Relationship between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and ventilation heterogeneity arising within proximal conducting airways (ScondVT) z-scores. Dotted lines indicate FEV1 LLN and ScondVT ULN. Percentage indicates proportion in each quadrant. (B) Relationship between FEV1 and ventilation heterogeneity arising within the acinar airways (SacinVT) z-scores. Dotted lines indicate FEV1 LLN and SacinVT ULN. Percentage indicates proportion in each quadrant. CI = confidence interval; LLN = lower limit of normal; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) Relationship between forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (FEF25–75) and standard lung clearance index (LCI 2.5) z-scores. Dotted lines indicate FEF25–75 LLN and LCI 2.5 ULN. Percentage indicates proportion in each quadrant. (B) Relationship between FEF25–75 and shortened lung clearance index (LCI 5.0) z-scores. Dotted lines indicate FEF25–75 LLN and LCI 5.0 ULN. Percentage indicates proportion in each quadrant. CI = confidence interval; LLN = lower limit of normal; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
ROC curves showing the sensitivity of multiple-breath washout and spirometry z-score parameters between healthy control subjects and subjects with bronchiectasis. FEF = forced expiratory flow; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC = forced vital capacity; LCI2.5 = standard lung clearance index; LCI5.0 = shortened lung clearance index; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.

References

    1. O’Neill K, O’Donnell AE, Bradley JM. Airway clearance, mucoactive therapies and pulmonary rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Respirology . 2019;24:227–237. - PubMed
    1. Bilton D, Daviskas E, Anderson SD, Kolbe J, King G, Stirling RG, et al. B301 Investigators Phase 3 randomized study of the efficacy and safety of inhaled dry powder mannitol for the symptomatic treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Chest . 2013;144:215–225. - PubMed
    1. Haworth CS, Foweraker JE, Wilkinson P, Kenyon RF, Bilton D. Inhaled colistin in patients with bronchiectasis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2014;189:975–982. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rowan SA, Bradley JM, Bradbury I, Lawson J, Lynch T, Gustafsson P, et al. Lung clearance index is a repeatable and sensitive indicator of radiological changes in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2014;189:586–592. - PubMed
    1. Grillo L, Irving S, Hansell DM, Nair A, Annan B, Ward S, et al. The reproducibility and responsiveness of the lung clearance index in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J . 2015;46:1645–1653. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data