Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1978 Jun;13(6):924-9.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.6.924.

Comparison of cephalothin and cefamandole prophylaxis during insertion of prosthetic heart valves

Clinical Trial

Comparison of cephalothin and cefamandole prophylaxis during insertion of prosthetic heart valves

G L Archer et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun.

Abstract

Cefamandole nafate (CM) and cephalothin sodium (CP) were administered as prophylaxis in a randomized, prospective study to 30 consecutive patients undergoing prosthetic cardiac valve insertion. A single dose of 20 mg/kg was given intramuscularly during anesthesia induction, and serial plasma antibiotic concentrations, atrial muscle and cardiac valve tissue antibiotic levels, plasma bactericidal activity against pathogenic staphylococci, and infectious complications were determined and compared for the two drugs. Both antibiotics produced high plasma levels (>20 mug/ml 30 min after injection) which fell less than 25% during the period of cardiopulmonary bypass. However, CM levels were significantly higher at most time periods (P<0.05) than CP levels. CP levels were undetectable in atrial muscle from 14 of 15 patients and in valves from 10 of 15 patients. In contrast, CM bioactivity was found in all tissues. Differences in tissue antibiotic concentration could not be accounted for by differences in plasma concentrations or by CP tissue binding and were assumed to be caused by differences in penetration. Plasma bactericidal activity against staphylococci was equal for the two drugs (median titer, 1:16). No infections were seen in either group. CM appeared to be an effective and perhaps preferable prophylactic antibiotic for use during cardiac surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Aug;6(2):177-82 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Apr;73(4):625-9 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Mar;73(3):470-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Jun;34(6):621-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978 Apr;23(4):473-80 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources