Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 3;11(4):479.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040479.

Tigecycline Dosing Strategies in Critically Ill Liver-Impaired Patients

Affiliations

Tigecycline Dosing Strategies in Critically Ill Liver-Impaired Patients

Lisa F Amann et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

This study investigated tigecycline exposure in critically ill patients from a population pharmacokinetic perspective to support rational dosing in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute and chronic liver impairment. A clinical dataset of 39 patients served as the basis for the development of a population pharmacokinetic model. The typical tigecycline clearance was strongly reduced (8.6 L/h) as compared to other populations. Different models were developed based on liver and kidney function-related covariates. Monte Carlo simulations were used to guide dose adjustments with the most predictive covariates: Child-Pugh score, total bilirubin, and MELD score. The best performing covariate, guiding a dose reduction to 25 mg q12h, was Child-Pugh score C, whereas patients with Child-Pugh score A/B received the standard dose of 50 mg q12h. Of note, the obtained 24 h steady-state area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUCss) range using this dosing strategy was predicted to be equivalent to high-dose tigecycline exposure (100 mg q12h) in non-ICU patients. In addition, 26/39 study participants died, and therapy failure was most correlated with chronic liver disease and renal failure, but no correlation between drug exposure and survival was observed. However, tigecycline in special patient populations needs further investigations to enhance clinical outcome.

Keywords: Child–Pugh score; dose adjustment; population pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulated AUCss in patients with Child–Pugh A/B and C and standard-dose tigecycline (50 mg q12h MD) compared to the simulated AUCss-vW ‘reference’ of high-dose tigecycline (100 mg q12h MD) in non-critically ill patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
AUCss from dose-adjusted low-dose tigecycline (25 mg q12h MD) groups vs. non-adjusted groups receiving standard-dose tigecycline (50 mg q12h MD) in our cohort, compared to the 95% interval of 100 mg q12h MD tigecycline from van Wart et al. in non-ICU patients without hepatic impairment (AUCss-vW, vertical lines). Optimal cutoffs for dose adjustment investigation were CPSC, total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL, MELD score ≥ 30, and eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min. The quantity [%] of simulated individuals within the 95% interval of AUCss-vW is displayed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis of AUCss/MIC ratio ≥ 17.9 and ≥ 6.96 over minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Dose adjustment (25 mg q12h MD) was applied for individuals with bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL, MELD score ≥ 30, and eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min and compared to non-adjusted (50 mg q12h MD) groups, as well as Child–Pugh score-based dose adjustment. Horizontal dotted line denotes 90% PTA90%.

References

    1. Boucher H.W., Wennersten C.B., Eliopoulos G.M. In Vitro Activities of the Glycylcycline GAR-936 against Gram-Positive Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2225–2229. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2225-2229.2000. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfizer Tygacil® Full Prescribing Information. [(accessed on 21 March 2022)]. Available online: https://www.pfizermedicalinformation.com/en-us/tygacil/dosage-admin.
    1. Meagher A.K., Passarell J.A., Cirincione B.B., Van Wart S.A., Liolios K., Babinchak T., Ellis-Grosse E.J., Ambrose P.G. Exposure-Response Analyses of Tigecycline Efficacy in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1939–1945. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01084-06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Passarell J.A., Meagher A.K., Liolios K., Cirincione B.B., Van Wart S.A., Babinchak T., Ellis-Grosse E.J., Ambrose P.G. Exposure-Response Analyses of Tigecycline Efficacy in Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008;52:204–210. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00813-07. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGovern P.C., Wible M., El-Tahtawy A., Biswas P., Meyer R.D. All-cause mortality imbalance in the tigecycline phase 3 and 4 clinical trials. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2013;41:463–467. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.01.020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources