Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 3;10(4):844.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10040844.

Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Membranes for Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Membranes for Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy

Mario Bonomini et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining therapy for millions of people worldwide. However, despite considerable technical and scientific improvements, results are still not fully satisfactory in terms of morbidity and mortality. The membrane contained in the hemodialyzer is undoubtedly the main determinant of the success and quality of hemodialysis therapy. Membrane properties influence solute removal and the interactions with blood components that define the membrane's biocompatibility. Bioincompatibility is considered a potential contributor to several uremic complications. Thus, the development of more biocompatible polymers used as hemodialyzer membrane is of utmost importance for improving results and clinical patient outcomes. Many different surface-modified membranes for hemodialysis have been manufactured over recent years by varying approaches in the attempt to minimize blood incompatibility. Their main characteristics and clinical results in hemodialysis patients were reviewed in the present article.

Keywords: biocompatibility; biomaterial; coagulation; hemodialysis; membrane; platelet; protein adsorption; surface modification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Activated pathways and their interplay during the interaction of blood components with artificial surfaces like the dialysis membrane material. Reproduced from reference (with permission of authors and publishers).

References

    1. Bikbov B., Purcell C.A., Levey A.S., Smith M., Abdoli A., Abebe M., Adebayo O.M., Afarideh M., Agarwal S.K., Agudelo-Botero M., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709–733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barraclough K.A., John A.W.M. Green nephrology. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020;16:257–268. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0245-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olczyk P., Małyszczak A., Kusztal M. Dialysis membranes: A 2018 update. Polim. Med. 2018;48:57–63. doi: 10.17219/pim/102974. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohlová M., Amorim C.G., Araújo A., Santos-Silva A., Solich P., Montenegro M.C.B.S.M. The biocompatibility and bioactivity of hemodialysis membranes: Their impact in end-stage renal disease. J. Artif. Organs. 2019;22:14–28. doi: 10.1007/s10047-018-1059-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Y.-A., Ou S.-M., Lin C.-C. Influence of dialysis membranes on clinical outcomes: From history to innovation. Membranes. 2022;12:152. doi: 10.3390/membranes12020152. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources