Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):886.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040886.

Soluble Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Disease Progression in Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations

Soluble Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Disease Progression in Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2

Noelia Díaz-Troyano et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Predicting disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is difficult. Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (sACE2) arises from the shedding of membrane ACE2 (mACE2), which is a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We evaluated the predictive value of sACE2 compared with known biomarkers of inflammation and tissue damage (CRP, GDF-15, IL-6, and sFlt-1) in 850 patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 with different clinical outcomes. For univariate analyses, median differences between biomarker levels were calculated for the following patient groups (classified by clinical outcome): RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive (Groups 1−4); RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 negative following previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (Groups 5 and 6); and ‘SARS-CoV-2 unexposed’ patients (Group 7). Median levels of CRP, GDF-15, IL-6, and sFlt-1 were significantly higher in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 compared with discharged patients (all p < 0.001), whereas levels of sACE2 were significantly lower (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis of sACE2 provided cut-offs for predicting hospital admission (≤0.05 ng/mL (positive predictive value: 89.1%) and ≥0.42 ng/mL (negative predictive value: 84.0%)). These findings support further investigation of sACE2, as a single biomarker or as part of a panel, to predict hospitalization risk and disease severity in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; biomarkers; disease severity; inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.W. and M.K. are employees of Roche Diagnostics GmbH and hold shares in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The other authors report no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of (a) CRP, (b) GDF-15, (c) IL-6, (d) sACE2, and (e) sFlt-1 by disease severity in patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were admitted to hospital (Groups 2–4) and patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were discharged (Group 1). Thick black line = median; yellow cross = mean; upper/lower limits and whiskers = interquartile range and maximum/minimum values excluding outliers.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of (a) CRP, (b) GDF-15, (c) IL-6, (d) sACE2, and (e) sFlt-1 by disease severity in patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were admitted to hospital (Groups 2–4) and patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were discharged (Group 1). Thick black line = median; yellow cross = mean; upper/lower limits and whiskers = interquartile range and maximum/minimum values excluding outliers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bivariate analysis performed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to hospital (Groups 2–4) versus patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were discharged (Group 1). Data are shown as ROC curves for (a) sFlt-1 + IL-6, (b) GDF-15 + IL-6, and (c) sACE2 + IL-6.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curve analysis used to calculate lower and upper cut-off values of sACE2 for the prediction of hospitalization in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Blue dotted lines = upper and lower limits of the 95% CI for AUC.

References

    1. Ghebreyesus T.A. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. 2020. [(accessed on 11 March 2020)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera....
    1. Caricchio R., Gallucci M., Dass C., Zhang X., Gallucci S., Fleece D., Bromberg M., Criner G.J. Preliminary predictive criteria for COVID-19 cytokine storm. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021;80:88–95. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218323. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wynants L., Van Calster B., Collins G.S., Riley R.D., Heinze G., Schuit E., Bonten M.M.J., Dahly D.L., Damen J.A., Debray T.P.A., et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19: Systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang L., Guo H. Biomarkers of COVID-19 and technologies to combat SARS-CoV-2. Adv. Biomark. Sci. Technol. 2020;2:1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.abst.2020.08.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodges G., Pallisgaard J., Olsen A.-M.S., Mcgettigan P., Andersen M., Krogager M., Kragholm K., Køber L., Gislason G.H., Torp-Pedersen C., et al. Association between biomarkers and COVID-19 severity and mortality: A nationwide Danish cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e041295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041295. - DOI - PMC - PubMed