Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 12;12(8):997.
doi: 10.3390/ani12080997.

Nutritional Modulation, Gut, and Omics Crosstalk in Ruminants

Affiliations
Review

Nutritional Modulation, Gut, and Omics Crosstalk in Ruminants

Mohamed Abdelrahman et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Ruminant nutrition has significantly revolutionized a new and prodigious molecular approach in livestock sciences over the last decade. Wide-spectrum advances in DNA and RNA technologies and analysis have produced a wealth of data that have shifted the research threshold scheme to a more affluent level. Recently, the published literature has pointed out the nutrient roles in different cellular genomic alterations among different ruminant species, besides the interactions with other factors, such as age, type, and breed. Additionally, it has addressed rumen microbes within the gut health and productivity context, which has made interpreting homogenous evidence more complicated. As a more systematic approach, nutrigenomics can identify how genomics interacts with nutrition and other variables linked to animal performance. Such findings should contribute to crystallizing powerful interpretations correlating feeding management with ruminant production and health through genomics. This review will present a road-mapping discussion of promising trends in ruminant nutrigenomics as a reference for phenotype expression through multi-level omics changes.

Keywords: feedomics; gene expression; nutrigenomics; nutrition; ruminant; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential of different dietary components and characteristics of molecular changes in a ruminant model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nutrition–gene interaction pathway in ruminants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Animal factors that can change the feedomics imprint.

References

    1. McLeod A. Others World Livestock 2011-Livestock in Food Security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Rome, Italy: 2011.
    1. Bouwman L., Goldewijk K.K., Van Der Hoek K.W., Beusen A.H.W., Van Vuuren D.P., Willems J., Rufino M.C., Stehfest E. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:20882–20887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012878108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dangal S.R.S., Tian H., Zhang B., Pan S., Lu C., Yang J. Methane emission from global livestock sector during 1890—2014: Magnitude, trends and spatiotemporal patterns. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017;23:4147–4161. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Godber O.F., Wall R. Livestock and food security: Vulnerability to population growth and climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014;20:3092–3102. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12589. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svinurai W., Mapanda F., Sithole D., Moyo E.N., Ndidzano K., Tsiga A., Zhakata W. Enteric methane emissions and their response to agro-ecological and livestock production systems dynamics in Zimbabwe. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;616–617:710–719. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.257. - DOI - PubMed