Diagnostic Value of High-Resolution Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Capsular Width in Temporomandibular Joint Effusion
- PMID: 35454967
- PMCID: PMC9029928
- DOI: 10.3390/life12040477
Diagnostic Value of High-Resolution Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Capsular Width in Temporomandibular Joint Effusion
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate if the increased temporomandibular joint (TMJ) capsular thickness, measured by ultrasound (US), is associated with the presence of effusion, diagnosed using MRI imaging. Materials and Methods: 102 patients with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were included in the study. Each patient underwent US and MRI examinations, 1 to 5 days following clinical examination. The US was performed with an 8−40 MHz linear transducer operating at 20 MHz. The MRI was performed using a 1.5 T MRI device. The ROC curve was analyzed to identify the optimal cut-off value for capsular distention, which can be interpreted as an indirect sign of TMJ effusion. Results: The capsular width values were found to be between 0.7 and 3.6 mm. The best cut-off value was 2.05 mm with a sensitivity of 55.9% and a specificity of 94.7%. The next optimal cut-off value was 1.75 mm with a sensitivity of 67.6% and a specificity of 82.4%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.78 (95% CI 0.68, 0.87, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Ultrasound-measured capsular width can be interpreted as an indirect sign of TMJ effusion. The critical cut-off for capsular width was 2 mm.
Keywords: effusion; magnetic resonance imaging; temporomandibular joint; ultrasonography.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Ultrasound assessment of increased capsular width as a predictor of temporomandibular joint effusion.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003 Nov;32(6):359-64. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/25091144. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003. PMID: 15070837
-
Ultrasound assessment of increased capsular width in temporomandibular joint internal derangements: relationship with joint pain and magnetic resonance grading of joint effusion.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jul;112(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 May 4. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011. PMID: 21543241 Clinical Trial.
-
Can ultrasonography be used to assess capsular distention in the painful temporomandibular joint?BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01853-0. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 34615517 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging modalities for temporomandibular joint disorders: an update.Clujul Med. 2018 Jul;91(3):280-287. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-970. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Clujul Med. 2018. PMID: 30093805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint.Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180(1):6-21. doi: 10.1159/000086194. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005. PMID: 16088129 Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship Between Temporomandibular Joint Effusion, Pain, and Jaw Function Limitation: A 2D and 3D Comparative Study.J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 12;17:2051-2062. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S448283. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38881762 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative ultrasonography for anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):6446-6455. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-401. Epub 2023 Aug 3. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023. PMID: 37869327 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rocabado M. Temporo Mandibular Joint Pain Map. CEDIME; Villaricca, Italy: 2012. Clinical Atlas 1, Synovial Joint Physiology.
-
- Okeson J. Bell’s Orofacial Pain. 7th ed. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.; Batavia, IL, USA: 2014.
-
- Okeson J. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 8th ed. Elsevier, Inc.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources