Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 15;10(4):618.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040618.

Assessment of Seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Lung Cancer

Affiliations

Assessment of Seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Lung Cancer

Ioannis P Trontzas et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 mortality rates are significantly higher in patients with lung cancer compared with the general population. However, little is known on their immunization status after vaccination. Methods: To evaluate the humoral response (seroconversion) of patients with lung cancer following vaccination against SARS-COV-2 (Group A), we obtained antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein both at baseline and at different time points after the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (two to three weeks [T1], six weeks ± one week [T2], 12 weeks ± three weeks [T3], and 24 weeks ± three weeks [T4]). Antibodies were also acquired from a control cohort of non-lung cancer patients (Group B) as well as a third cohort containing healthy controls (Group C) at all time points and at T4, respectively, to make comparisons with Group A. Analysis of antibody response at different time points, association with clinicopathologic parameters, and comparisons with control groups were performed. Results: A total of 125 patients with lung cancer were included in the analysis (96 males [74.3%], median age of 68 years [46−91]. All study participants received two vaccine doses (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, AZD1222). Analysis of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titers showed minimal response at T1 (0.4 [0.4−48.6] IU/mL). Antibody response peaked at T2 (527.0 [0.4−2500] IU/mL) and declined over T3 (323.0 [0.4−2500] IU/mL) and T4 (141.0 [0.4−2500] IU/mL). Active smokers had lower antibody titers at T2 (p = 0.04), T3 (p = 0.04), and T4 (p < 0.0001) compared with former or never smokers. Peak antibody titers were not associated with any other clinicopathologic characteristic. No significant differences were observed compared with Group B. However, lung cancer patients exhibited significantly decreased antibody titers compared with Group C at T4 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Lung cancer patients demonstrate sufficient antibody response six weeks after the first dose of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 when vaccinated with two-dose regimens. Rapidly declining antibody titers six weeks after the first dose underline the need for a third dose three months later, in patients with lung cancer, and especially active smokers.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; humoral immunity; lung cancer; seroconversion; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study. Roche diagnostics had no role in the design, execution, interpretation or writing of the study.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Univariate analysis of seroconversion at different time points for lung cancer patients; mean antibody titers with 95% confidence intervals (y axis) relative to timepoint assessed (x axis); ns: no statistical significance (p = 0.99); ****: statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001); *: no statistically significant difference between T2 versus T3 (p = 0.02) and T3 versus T4 (p = 0.03).
Figure A2
Figure A2
(A). Seroconversion comparison between lung and non-lung cancer patients; mean antibody titers with 95% confidence intervals (y axis) relative to timepoint assessed (x axis). (B). Seroconversion comparison between lung cancer patients and healthy controls; mean antibody titers with 95% confidence intervals (y axis) relative to timepoint assessed (x axis); ns: no statistical significance; ***: statistically significant difference (p = 0.003).
Figure A3
Figure A3
(A). Seroconversion comparison between active and former/never-smokers for lung cancer patients; mean antibody titers with 95% confidence intervals (y axis) relative to smoking status (x axis). (B). Seroconversion comparison between active and former/never-smokers for healthy controls; mean antibody titers with 95% confidence intervals (y axis) relative to smoking status (x axis); ns: no statistical significance; ****: statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yesudhas D., Srivastava A., Gromiha M.M. COVID-19 outbreak: History, mechanism, transmission, structural studies and therapeutics. Infection. 2021;49:199–213. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01516-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Word Health Organization Who Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. [(accessed on 5 January 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera....
    1. Li J., Huang D.Q., Zou B., Yang H., Hui W.Z., Rui F., Yee N.T.S., Liu C., Nerurkar S.N., Kai J.C.Y., et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. J. Med. Virol. 2021;93:1449–1458. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26424. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Desai A., Gupta R., Advani S., Ouellette L., Kuderer N.M., Lyman G.H., Li A. Mortality in hospitalized patients with cancer and coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer. 2021;127:1459–1468. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33386. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang L., Chai P., Yu J., Fan X. Effects of cancer on patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 63,019 participants. Cancer Biol. Med. 2021;18:298–307. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0559. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources