Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 1;9(4):488.
doi: 10.3390/children9040488.

Formulation Challenges and Strategies to Develop Pediatric Dosage Forms

Affiliations
Review

Formulation Challenges and Strategies to Develop Pediatric Dosage Forms

Wedad A Malkawi et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

The development of pediatric-specific dose forms is particularly difficult due to a variety of factors relating to pediatric population differences from adult populations. The buccal dosage form is considered a good alternative to oral dosage form if the latter cannot be used in pediatric patients. Both oral and buccal dosage formulations uphold great application qualities for pediatric patients. This review sheds light on both oral and buccal, as they are the most convenient dosage forms for pediatrics. The use of adult drugs to treat children is a legislation concern, as it may result in incorrect dose, safety, and efficacy. The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) and the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) are two key pieces of legislation that encourage and regulate pediatric medication research. Both contribute to a well-balanced approach to emphasizing critical safety and efficacy warnings for the of medications within pediatric populations. These contributions are what enable companies to continue making significant investments in pediatric drug developments. Despite the importance of investigating medicines for children, there is still a demand for pediatric-specific formulations and dosage forms. Many formulations and dosage forms can be designed, among which the buccal drug delivery seems a good modality for pediatric-friendly dosage forms. The main issues associated with these pediatric dosage forms development, particularly clinical and physiological factors, are discussed in this review. In addition, formulation developments and regulatory expectations are highlighted. In turn, suggestions are made to potentially improve future pediatric formulation development.

Keywords: buccal; dosage form; excipients; formulation development; oral; pediatrics; regulatory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Challenges associated with developing pediatric-friendly dosage forms.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pharmaceutical oral and transmucosal buccal dosage form.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pharmaceutical technology techniques for taste masking that would need to be assessed for safety in pediatric formulations.

References

    1. Sachs A.N., Avant D., Lee C.S., Rodriguez W., Murphy M.D. Pediatric information in drug product labeling. JAMA. 2012;307:1914–1915. - PubMed
    1. Carmack M., Berde C., Monuteaux M.C., Manzi S., Bourgeois F.T. Off-label use of prescription analgesics among hospitalized children in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2020;29:474–481. doi: 10.1002/pds.4978. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kölch M., Schnoor K., Fegert J.M. The EU-regulation on medicinal products for pediatric use. ECAP. 2007;16:229–235. - PubMed
    1. Momper J.D., Mulugeta Y., Burckart G.J. Failed pediatric drug development trials. CPT. 2015;98:245–251. doi: 10.1002/cpt.142. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wharton G.T., Murphy M.D., Avant D., Goldsmith J.V., Chai G., Rodriguez W.J., Eisenstein E.L. Impact of pediatric exclusivity on drug labeling and demonstrations of efficacy. AAP. 2014;134:512–518. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2987. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources