Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 15;11(4):473.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040473.

Predictive Models for Weekly Cattle Mortality after Arrival at a Feeding Location Using Records, Weather, and Transport Data at Time of Purchase

Affiliations

Predictive Models for Weekly Cattle Mortality after Arrival at a Feeding Location Using Records, Weather, and Transport Data at Time of Purchase

Lauren Wisnieski et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Feedlot mortality negatively affects animal welfare and profitability. To the best of our knowledge, there are no publications on predictive models for weekly all-cause mortality in feedlot cattle. In this study, random forest models to predict weekly mortality for cattle purchase groups (n = 14,217 purchase groups; 860,545 animals) from arrival at the feeding location (Day 1) to Day 42 and cumulative mortality from Day 43 until slaughter were built using records, weather, and transport data available at the time of purchase. Models were evaluated by calculating the root mean squared error (RMSE) and accuracy (as defined as the percent of purchase groups that had predictions within 0.25% and 0.50% of actual mortality). The models had high accuracy (>90%), but the RMSE estimates were high (range = 1.0% to 4.1%). The best predictors were maximum temperature and purchase weight, although this varied by week. The models performed well among purchase groups with low weekly mortality but performed poorly in high mortality purchase groups. Although high mortality purchase groups were not accurately predicted utilizing the models in this study, the models may potentially have utility as a screening tool for very low mortality purchase groups after arrival. Future studies should consider building iterative models that utilize the strongest predictors identified in this study.

Keywords: beef cattle; feedlot health; mortality; predictive modeling; random forests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) Part III: Trends in Health and Management Practices on U.S. Feedlots, 1994–2011. United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Sciences, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health; Fort Collins, CO, USA: 2011.
    1. Brooks K.R., Raper K.C., Ward C.E., Holland B.P., Krehbiel C.R., Step D.L. Economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on feedlot cattle during backgrounding and finishing phases. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2011;27:195–203. doi: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30474-5. - DOI
    1. Irsik M., Langemeier M., Schroeder T., Spire M., Order J.D. Estimating the effects of animal health on the performance of feedlot cattle. Bovine Pract. 2006;40:65–74.
    1. Taylor J.D., Lehenbauer T.W., Step D.L., Confer A.W. The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: What is the evidence for preventive measures? Can. Vet. J. 2010;51:1351–1359. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noffsinger T., Lukasiewicz K., Hyder L. Feedlot processing and arrival cattle management. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. 2015;31:323–340. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.06.002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources