Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted Reproduction
- PMID: 35456243
- PMCID: PMC9027760
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082151
Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted Reproduction
Abstract
Since the birth of Louise Joy Brown, the first baby conceived via in vitro fertilization, more than 9 million children have been born worldwide using assisted reproductive technologies (ART). In vivo fertilization takes place in the maternal oviduct, where the unique physiological conditions guarantee the healthy development of the embryo. During early embryogenesis, a major wave of epigenetic reprogramming takes place that is crucial for the correct development of the embryo. Epigenetic reprogramming is susceptible to environmental changes and non-physiological conditions such as those applied during in vitro culture, including shift in pH and temperature, oxygen tension, controlled ovarian stimulation, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, as well as preimplantation embryo manipulations for genetic testing. In the last decade, concerns were raised of a possible link between ART and increased incidence of imprinting disorders, as well as epigenetic alterations in the germ cells of infertile parents that are transmitted to the offspring following ART. The aim of this review was to present evidence from the literature regarding epigenetic errors linked to assisted reproduction treatments and their consequences on the conceived children. Furthermore, we provide an overview of disease risk associated with epigenetic or imprinting alterations in children born via ART.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; epigenetics; human in vitro fertilization; imprinting disorders.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Exploring the effect of cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology and potential epigenetic risk.Zygote. 2023 Oct;31(5):420-432. doi: 10.1017/S0967199423000345. Epub 2023 Jul 6. Zygote. 2023. PMID: 37409505 Review.
-
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014. PMID: 24444289
-
Risk of genetic and epigenetic alteration in children conceived following ART: Is it time to return to nature whenever possible?Clin Genet. 2023 Feb;103(2):133-145. doi: 10.1111/cge.14232. Epub 2022 Oct 1. Clin Genet. 2023. PMID: 36109352 Review.
-
Can Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Induce Epigenetic Changes to Gametes and Embryos?J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 2;12(13):4444. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134444. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37445479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contemporary Use of ICSI and Epigenetic Risks to Future Generations.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 11;11(8):2135. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082135. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35456226 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):6-12. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240069. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025. PMID: 39688437 Free PMC article.
-
Causes of embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and metaanalysis of procedures to increase embryo implantation potential.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 14;15:1429193. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1429193. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40028443 Free PMC article.
-
Hyperglycemia-induced TET3 insufficiency is responsible for maternal transmission of glucose intolerance†.Biol Reprod. 2022 Sep 12;107(3):676-678. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac115. Biol Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35640226 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The most appropriate indicators of successful ovarian stimulation.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Jan 9;23(Suppl 1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01331-6. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 39789602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Promising Perinatal Outcome after Using a Simplified Low-Cost IVF Culture System Specifically Designed for Resource-Poor Countries.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2264. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062264. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36983264 Free PMC article.
References
-
- De Geyter C., Wyns C., Calhaz-Jorge C., De Mouzon J., Ferraretti A.P., Kupka M., Andersen A.N., Nygren K.G., Goossens V. 20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium registry: What have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions. Hum. Reprod. 2020;35:2832–2849. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa250. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Thoma M.E., McLain A., Louis J.F., King R.B., Trumble A.C., Sundaram R., Louis G.B. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil. Steril. 2013;99:1324–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ventura-Juncá P., Irarrázaval I., Rolle A.J., Gutiérrez J.I., Moreno R.D., Santos M.J. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in mammals: Epigenetic and developmental alterations. Scientific and bioethical implications for IVF in humans. Biol. Res. 2015;48:68. doi: 10.1186/s40659-015-0059-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources