Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 25;10(4):714.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040714.

Detection of Zoonotic Gastrointestinal Pathogens in Dairy Sheep and Goats by Using FilmArray® Multiplex-PCR Technology

Affiliations

Detection of Zoonotic Gastrointestinal Pathogens in Dairy Sheep and Goats by Using FilmArray® Multiplex-PCR Technology

Katerina Tsilipounidaki et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (a) to detect gastrointestinal pathogens in faecal samples of sheep and goats using the FilmArray® GI Panel and (b) to evaluate factors that were associated with their presence. Faecal samples from ewes or does in 70 sheep flocks and 24 goat herds in Greece were tested for the presence of 22 gastrointestinal pathogens by means of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel. The most frequently detected pathogens were Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli stx1/stx2 (94.7% of farms), Giardia lamblia (59.6%), and Campylobacter spp. (50.0% of farms). Other pathogens detected were Cryptosporidium spp., Salmonella spp., enterotoxigenic E. coli lt/st, Yersinia enterocolitica, E. coli O157, Rotavirus A, Shigella/enteroinvasive E. coli, and Plesiomonasshigelloides. There was a difference in the prevalence of detection of pathogens between sheep and goat farms only for Salmonella spp.: 18.3% versus 0.0%, respectively. Mixed infections were detected in 76 farms (80.9% of farms), specifically 57 sheep flocks and 19 goat herds, with on average, 2.5 ± 0.1 pathogens detected per farm. The body condition score of ewes in farms, in which only one pathogen was detected in faecal samples, was significantly higher than that of ewes in farms, in which at least two pathogens were detected: 2.55 ± 0.11 versus 2.31 ± 0.04. In sheep flocks, the number of pathogens in faecal samples was significantly higher in farms with semi-extensive management. In goat herds, the number of pathogens in faecal samples was positively correlated with average precipitation and inversely correlated with temperature range in the respective locations.

Keywords: Campylobacter; Cryptosporidium; Escherichia coli; FilmArray; Giardia; Rotavirus; Salmonella; Vibrio; Yersinia; diarrhoea; goat; sheep; zoonoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average precipitation (left histogram) and average temperature at 2 m (right histogram) in the locations of goat farms for the 15 days prior to sampling in accord with the number of pathogens recovered in faecal samples from these farms.

References

    1. Barger I.A. Influence of sex and reproductive status on susceptibility of ruminants to nematode parasitism. Int. J. Parasitol. 1993;23:463–469. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(93)90034-V. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beasley A.M., Kahn L.P., Windon R.G. The periparturient relaxation of immunity in Merino ewes infected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis: Parasitological and immunological responses. Vet. Parasitol. 2010;168:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marquetoux N., Mitchell R., Ridler A., Heuer C., Wilson P. A synthesis of the patho-physiology of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in sheep to inform mathematical modelling of ovine paratuberculosis. Vet. Res. 2018;49:27. doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0522-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stensvold C.R., Nielsen H.V. Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports an incentive for molecular screening platforms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50:540–541. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06012-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed N.H., Chowdhary A. Comparison of different methods of detection of enteric pathogenic protozoa. Ind. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013;31:154–160. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources