Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):539.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07923-5.

Organizational readiness to implement the Serious Illness Care Program in hospital settings in Sweden

Sofia Andersson  1 , Anna Sandgren  2
Affiliations

Organizational readiness to implement the Serious Illness Care Program in hospital settings in Sweden

Sofia Andersson et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) is a model developed for structured communication, identifying patients, and training physicians to use a structured guide for conversations with patients and family members. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the sustainable implementation of this conversation model. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers during the implementation of the SICP in hospital settings.

Methods: The SICP was implemented at 20 units in two hospitals in Sweden. During the implementation process, seven individual interviews and two group interviews were conducted with seven facilitators (five physicians, one behavioral therapist, and one administrator). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, first inductively, and then deductively using the organizational readiness for change as a theoretical framework.

Result: The analysis resulted in three factors acting as enablers and eight factors acting as enablers and/or barriers during the implementation of the SICP. The three factors considered as enablers were preliminaries, identifying patients, and facilitator's role. The eight factors considered as enablers and/or barriers were broad implementation, leadership, time, confidence, building foundation, motivation to work change, motivation for training in serious illness conversations, and attitudes.

Conclusion: This study indicates limited readiness to implement the SICP in hospital settings due to considerable variation in organizational contextual factors, change efficacy, and change commitment. The identified enablers and barriers for implementation of the SICP could guide and support future implementations to be sustainable over time.

Keywords: Conversation; Implementation; Organization readiness for change; Palliative care; Qualitative; Serious illness; Serious illness program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Kaasa S, Loge JH, Aapro M, Albreht T, Anderson R, Bruera E, et al. Integration of oncology and palliative care: a lancet oncology commission. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:e588–e653. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30415-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. NCP, National consensus project – for quality palliative care . Clinical practice Guidelines for Quality of Care. 4 2017. - PubMed
    1. WHO . World Health Organization definition palliative care. 2002.
    1. Wenrich MD, Curtis JR, Ambrozy DA, Carline JD, Shannon SE, Ramsey PG. Dying patients’ need for emotional support and personalized care from physicians: perspectives of patients with terminal illness, families, and health care providers. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2003;25:236–246. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00694-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones J, Nowels C, Kutner JS, Matlock DD. Shared decision making and the use of a patient decision aid in advanced serious illness: provider and patient perspectives. Health Expect. 2015;18:3236–3247. doi: 10.1111/hex.12313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed