Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 22;23(1):337.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06261-5.

Implementation and evaluation of a large-scale postpartum family planning program in Rwanda: study protocol for a clinic-randomized controlled trial

Kristin M Wall  1 , Rosine Ingabire  2 , Amelia Mazzei  2   3 , Claudine Umuhoza  2 , Rachel Parker  3 , Amanda Tichacek  3 , Azhar Nizam  4 , Jessica M Sales  5 , Lisa B Haddad  6 , Phaedra Corso  7 , Susan Allen  3 , Julien Nyombayire  2 , Etienne Karita  2   3
Affiliations

Implementation and evaluation of a large-scale postpartum family planning program in Rwanda: study protocol for a clinic-randomized controlled trial

Kristin M Wall et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Though the Rwandan Ministry of Health (MOH) prioritizes the scale-up of postpartum family planning (PPFP) programs, uptake and sustainability of PPFP services in Rwanda are low. Furthermore, highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive method use (LARC), key in effective PPFP programs, is specifically low in Rwanda. We previously pilot tested a supply-demand intervention which significantly increased the use of postpartum LARC (PPLARC) in Rwandan government clinics. In this protocol, we use an implementation science framework to test whether our intervention is adaptable to large-scale implementation, cost-effective, and sustainable.

Methods: In a type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study, we will evaluate the impact of our PPFP intervention on postpartum LARC (PPLARC) uptake in a clinic-randomized trial in 12 high-volume health facilities in Kigali, Rwanda. We will evaluate this hybrid study using the RE-AIM framework. The independent effectiveness of each PPFP demand creation strategy on PPLARC uptake among antenatal clinic attendees who later deliver in a study facility will be estimated. To assess sustainability, we will assess the intervention adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Finally, we will evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness and develop a national costed implementation plan.

Discussion: Adaptability and sustainability within government facilities are critical aspects of our proposal, and the MOH and other local stakeholders will be engaged from the outset. We expect to deliver PPFP counseling to over 21,000 women/couples during the project period. We hypothesize that the intervention will significantly increase the number of stakeholders engaged, PPFP providers and promoters trained, couples/clients receiving information about PPFP, and PPLARC uptake comparing intervention versus standard of care. We expect PPFP client satisfaction will be high. Finally, we also hypothesize that the intervention will be cost-saving relative to the standard of care. This intervention could dramatically reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion, as well as improve maternal and newborn health. Our PPFP implementation model is designed to be replicable and expandable to other countries in the region which similarly have a high unmet need for PPFP.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05056545 . Registered on 31 March 2022.

Keywords: Birth spacing; Contraception; Family planning; Implementation; Postpartum; Rwanda; Stepped-wedge randomized trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. USAID. DHS Statcompiler 2018. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/data/STATcompiler.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2018.
    1. USAID, MCHIP. Family planning needs during the first two years postpartum in Rwanda. 2010. Available from: https://www.k4health.org/sites/default/files/Rwanda%202010%20DHS%20Reana.... Accessed 17 July 2018.
    1. Cleland J, Shah IH, Benova L. A fresh look at the level of unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period, its causes and program implications. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015;41(3):155–162. doi: 10.1363/intsexrephea.41.3.155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pfitzer A, Mackenzie D, Blanchard H, Hyjazi Y, Kumar S, Lisanework Kassa S, et al. A facility birth can be the time to start family planning: postpartum intrauterine device experiences from six countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(Suppl 2):S54–S61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ingabire R, Nyombayire J, Hoagland A, Da Costa V, Mazzei A, Haddad L, et al. Evaluation of a multi-level intervention to improve post-partum intrauterine device services in Rwanda. Gates Open Res. 2018;2(38). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data