Intentional Understanding Through Action Coordination in Early Triadic Interactions
- PMID: 35460046
- DOI: 10.1007/s12124-022-09677-5
Intentional Understanding Through Action Coordination in Early Triadic Interactions
Abstract
The ability to understand the behaviour of other people in intentional terms has been traditionally explained by resorting to inferential mechanisms that would allow individuals to access the internal mental states of others. In recent years, the second-person perspective has established itself as a theoretical alternative to traditional models. It argues that intentional understanding is an embodied, natural, and immediate process that occurs in situations such as face-to-face early dyadic interactions between adults and infants. In this article, we argue that the way in which the second-person perspective regards body and object is problematic. Based on psychological evidence that demonstrates the constitutive role of the body and objects for cognitive development, we propose the foundations of an ecological-enactive, semiotic and pragmatic model of intentional understanding. We argue that intentional understanding should be conceived as the skilful coordination of behaviours that subjects come to enact in interactive settings, following the dynamics of bodily and material practices that have acquired normative force over time.
Keywords: Body; Cognitive semiotics; Ecological-enactive perspective; Intentional understanding; Objects.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Triadic interactions support infants' emerging understanding of intentional actions.Dev Sci. 2020 Mar;23(2):e12880. doi: 10.1111/desc.12880. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Dev Sci. 2020. PMID: 31206980 Free PMC article.
-
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009. PMID: 19673160 Review.
-
Enactive social cognition: Diachronic constitution & coupled anticipation.Conscious Cogn. 2019 Apr;70:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 15. Conscious Cogn. 2019. PMID: 30772628 Review.
-
Dyadic interactions, attachment and the presence of triadic interactions in chimpanzees and humans.Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Aug;48(Pt A):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 14. Infant Behav Dev. 2017. PMID: 27856032
-
Naturalizing semiotics: The triadic sign of Charles Sanders Peirce as a systems property.Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015 Dec;119(3):563-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015. PMID: 26276466 Review.
Cited by
-
Materiality and Cognitive Development: Contemporary Debates and Empirical Studies in Early Childhood.Eur J Psychol. 2024 May 29;20(2):79-83. doi: 10.5964/ejop.14433. eCollection 2024 May. Eur J Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39118996 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Material Engagement Shaping Participation of Children on the Autism Spectrum: Embodiment and Subjectivity in Small-Group Learning.Eur J Psychol. 2024 May 29;20(2):143-164. doi: 10.5964/ejop.13307. eCollection 2024 May. Eur J Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39119000 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2015). Motor development. In R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.) & L. Liben & U. Muller (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 2: Cognitive processes (7th ed.) (pp. 114–157). Wiley
-
- Adolph, K. E. (2019). An ecological approach to learning in (not and) development. Human Development, 63(3–4), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503823 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Adolph, K. E., Hoch, J. E., & Cole, W. G. (2018). Development (of walking): 15 suggestions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(8), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.010 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Alessandroni, N. (2017). Development of metaphorical thought before language: The pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 618–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9373-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alessandroni, N. (2018). Varieties of embodiment in cognitive science. Theory & Psychology, 28(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317745589 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical