Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;51(6):563-572.
doi: 10.1111/jop.13301. Epub 2022 May 11.

Immunoexpression of oral brush biopsy enhances the accuracy of diagnosis for oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions

Affiliations

Immunoexpression of oral brush biopsy enhances the accuracy of diagnosis for oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions

Majdy Idrees et al. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the efficacy of using oral liquid-based brush cytology (OLBC) coupled with immunostained cytology-derived cell-blocks, quantified using machine-learning, in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus (OLP).

Methods: Eighty-two patients diagnosed clinically with either OLP or oral lichenoid lesion (OLL) were included. OLBC samples were obtained from all patients before undergoing surgical biopsy. Liquid-based cytology slides and cell-blocks were prepared and assessed by cytomorphology and immunocytochemistry for four antibodies (Ki-67, BAX, NF-κB-p65, and AMACR). For comparison purposes, a sub-group of 31 matched surgical biopsy samples were selected randomly and assessed by immunohistochemistry. Patients were categorized according to their definitive diagnoses into OLP, OLL, and clinically lichenoid, but histopathologically dysplastic lesions (OEDL). Machine-learning was utilized to provide automated quantification of positively stained protein expression.

Results: Cytomorphological assessment was associated with an accuracy of 77.27% in the distinction between OLP/OLL and OEDL. A strong concordance of 92.5% (κ = 0.84) of immunostaining patterns was evident between cell-blocks and tissue sections using machine-learning. A diagnostic index using a Ki-67-based model was 100% accurate in detecting lichenoid cases with epithelial dysplasia. A BAX-based model demonstrated an accuracy of 92.16%. The accuracy of cytomorphological assessment was greatly improved when it was combined with BAX immunoreactivity (95%).

Conclusions: Cell-blocks prepared from OLBC are reliable and minimally-invasive alternatives to surgical biopsies to diagnose OLLs with epithelial dysplasia when combined with Ki-67 immunostaining. Machine-learning has a promising role in the automated quantification of immunostained protein expression.

Keywords: cell-blocks; computer-assisted diagnosis; epithelial dysplasia; liquid-based brush cytology; oral lichen planus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A representative flow diagram of the study's design
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Immunocytochemical expression of investigated proteins and the performance of proposed immunostaining quantification scenarios in representative cell‐block samples. (A1,A2) Ki‐67 in OLP, (B1,B2) Ki‐67 in OEDL, (C1,C2) Ki‐67 in OLL, (D1,D2) BAX in OLL, (E1,E2 BAX in OLP, (F1,F2) BAX in OEDL, (G1,G2) NF‐kP‐p65 in OLL, (H1,H2) NF‐kP‐p65 in OEDL, (I1,I2) NF‐kP‐p65 in OLP
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Representative images showing immunohistochemical expression of investigated proteins and the performance of the proposed immunostaining quantification scenarios in a case of OLP. Magnification ×200

References

    1. Gonzalez‐Moles M, Warnakulasuriya S, Gonzalez‐Ruiz I, et al. Worldwide prevalence of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oral Dis. 2021;27(4):813‐828. doi: 10.1111/odi.13323 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Idrees M, Farah CS, Khurram SA, Firth N, Soluk‐Tekkesin M, Kujan O. Observer agreement in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus using the proposed criteria of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;50(5):520‐527. doi: 10.1111/jop.13170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Czerninski R, Zeituni S, Maly A, Basile J. Clinical characteristics of lichen and dysplasia vs lichen planus cases and dysplasia cases. Oral Dis. 2015;21(4):478‐482. doi: 10.1111/odi.12306 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Idrees M, Kujan O, Shearston K, Farah CS. Oral lichen planus has a very low malignant transformation rate: a systematic review and meta‐analysis using strict diagnostic and inclusion criteria. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;50(3):287‐298. doi: 10.1111/jop.12996 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warnakulasuriya S, Kujan O, Aguirre‐Urizar JM, et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: a consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 2020;27(8):1862‐1880. doi: 10.1111/odi.13704 - DOI - PubMed