Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:3:770517.
doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.770517. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

A systematic review to guide future efforts in the determination of genetic causes of pregnancy loss

Affiliations

A systematic review to guide future efforts in the determination of genetic causes of pregnancy loss

Andrew Z Carey et al. Front Reprod Health. 2021.

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy loss is the most common obstetric complication occurring in almost 30% of conceptions overall and in 12-14% of clinically recognized pregnancies. Pregnancy loss has strong genetic underpinnings, and despite this consensus, our understanding of its genetic causes remains limited. We conducted a systematic review of genetic factors in pregnancy loss to identify strategies to guide future research.

Methods: To synthesize data from population-based association studies on genetics of pregnancy loss, we searched PubMed for relevant articles published between 01/01/2000-01/01/2020. We excluded review articles, case studies, studies with limited sample sizes to detect associations (N<4), descriptive studies, commentaries, and studies with non-genetic etiologies. Studies were classified based on developmental periods in gestation to synthesize data across various developmental epochs.

Results: Our search yielded 580 potential titles with 107 (18%) eligible after title/abstract review. Of these, 54 (50%) were selected for systematic review after full-text review. These studies examined either early pregnancy (n=9 [17%]), stillbirth (n=10 [18%]), recurrent pregnancy loss (n=32 [59%]), unclassified pregnancy loss (n=3 [4%]) as their primary outcomes. Multiple genetic pathways that are essential for embryonic/fetal survival as well as human development were identified.

Conclusion: Several genetic pathways may play a role in pregnancy loss across developmental periods in gestation. Systematic evaluation of pregnancy loss across developmental epochs, utilizing whole genome sequencing in families may further elucidate causal genetic mechanisms and identify other pathways critical for embryonic/fetal survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest Conflicts of interest None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening process of full-text manuscripts included in systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venn diagram of pregnancy loss studies that examined genetic factors assessed in products of conception obtained from fetal/placental and parental samples.

References

    1. Feodor Nilsson S, Andersen PK, Strandberg-Larsen K, Nybo Andersen A-M. Risk factors for miscarriage from a prevention perspective: a nationwide follow-up study. BJOG : Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. (2014) 121:94. 10.1111/1471-0528.12694 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rossen LM, Ahrens KA, Branum AM. Trends in risk of pregnancy loss among us women, 1990–2011. Paediatric Perinat Epidemiol. (2018) 32:19–29. 10.1111/ppe.12417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR, Silver RM, Thorsten VR, Parker CB, et al. . Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N E J Med.. (2012) 367:2185–93. 10.1056/NEJMoa1201569 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frias AE, Luikenaar RA, Sullivan AE, Lee RM, Porter TF, Branch DW, et al. . Poor obstetric outcome in subsequent pregnancies in women with prior fetal death. Obstet Gynecol. (2004) 104:521–6. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000137350.89939.2a - DOI - PubMed
    1. No RGG. The Investigation and Treatment of Couples With Recurrent First-trimester and Second-trimester Miscarriage. RCOG: London; (2011).

LinkOut - more resources