Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Denture Base Materials: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In-vitro Studies
- PMID: 35462750
- PMCID: PMC9022382
- DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_310_21
Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Denture Base Materials: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In-vitro Studies
Abstract
Introduction: Digital complete dentures fabrication techniques are expanding. This study aimed to review flexural strength (FS) of milled and 3D-printed denture base materials to answer the study question: is FS of computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) denture base comparable to conventional heat-polymerized materials?
Materials and methods: Search was done within different databases for articles published between January 2010 and June 2021 using specific keywords. Articles of in-vitro studies in English language with methods following International Standards Organization standardization/ADA specifications for flexural testing of conventional and CAD/CAM (milled or printed) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials were included.
Results: Out of the 61 studies, 9 were processed for data extraction and only 7 underwent meta-analysis. Two, six, and one study showed high, moderate, and low risk of bias, respectively. Random-effects model was used for analysis and resulted in the average FS of 120.61 MPa [95% confidence interval (CI): 109.81-131.41] and 92.16 MPa (CI: 75.12-109.19) for CAD/CAM milled and heat-polymerized PMMA, respectively.
Conclusion: Subtractive CAD/CAM technique of denture fabrication showed satisfactory FS values, whereas additive CAD/CAM method was comparable to conventional heat-polymerized technique with lower value, requiring further investigations and improvement. The clinical use of milled denture bases is an acceptable substitution to heat-polymerized PMMA, making the denture fabrication an easier and faster process.
Keywords: 3D-printed denture base; CAD/CAM denture base; PMMA; flexural strength.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Paulino MR, Alves LR, Gurgel BC, Calderon PS. Simplified versus traditional techniques for complete denture fabrication: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:12–6. - PubMed
-
- Al-Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Özcan M. A comparison of the surface properties of CAD/CAM and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) J Prosthodont. 2019;28:452–7. - PubMed
-
- Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Finger I. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:351–5. - PubMed
-
- AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:233–8. - PubMed
-
- Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. CAD/CAM complete dentures: A review of two commercial fabrication systems. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013;41:407–16. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous