Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;16(5):104.
doi: 10.3892/mco.2022.2537. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

Transition of the PD-1 occupancy of nivolumab on T cells after discontinuation and response of nivolumab re-challenge

Affiliations

Transition of the PD-1 occupancy of nivolumab on T cells after discontinuation and response of nivolumab re-challenge

Taku Nose et al. Mol Clin Oncol. 2022 May.

Abstract

Although nivolumab is administered every two or four weeks, high programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) binding of nivolumab on T cells lasting for several months has been reported. A relationship between the PD-1 occupancy rate on T-cells and the efficacy of nivolumab is not yet fully understood. The present study used flow cytometric analyses to determine the time-dependence of PD-1 occupancy in five patients who discontinued nivolumab. The relationship between PD-1 occupancy at relapse and the efficacy of re-challenge was also studied. Occupancies after discontinuation were measured at a total of 32 points. The data indicated that it took 32.4 and 48.9 weeks to decrease occupancy by 50 and 70%, respectively. Subsequently, two patients had recurrence and were re-challenged with nivolumab. At that time, one patient had 70.8% occupancy while the other had 6.6%. Treatment was effective only for the patient with lower occupancy. Overall, the present study suggests that re-challenge with nivolumab may be efficacious in patients with low occupancy at recurrence.

Keywords: nivolumab re-challenge; occupancy; programmed cell death-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Hironobu Minami has received research grants and honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Chugai Pharmaceutical. Naomi Kiyota has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PD-1 binding vs. time. Binding of nivolumab to T cells was determined at 32 different time-points after discontinuation of treatment. The broken line was derived by linear regression of the data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Temporal changes in nivolumab binding to T cell PD-1. The x-axis indicates weeks after the final dose of nivolumab. After discontinuation of treatment, binding was determined for each patient periodically. Arrows indicate when disease recurrence was observed in patients 4 and 5. The star indicates the occupancy rate after re-challenged with nivolumab in Patient 5.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Axial computed tomography of patients 4 and 5 at the time of recurrence and after resumption of nivolumab treatment. Arrows indicate each tumor.

References

    1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:252–264. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: A common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:450–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, Powderly JD, Sosman JA, Atkins MB, Leming PD, et al. Five-year survival and correlates among patients with advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1411–1420. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, Dummer R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1480–1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinn C, Garrison LP, Pownell AK, Atkins MB, de Pouvourville G, Harrington K, Ascierto PA, McEwan P, Wagner S, Borrill J, Wu E. Current challenges for assessing the long-term clinical benefit of cancer immunotherapy: A multi-stakeholder perspective. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(e000648) doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed