Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 8:13:843575.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.843575. eCollection 2022.

CRISPR/Cas9 and Nanotechnology Pertinence in Agricultural Crop Refinement

Affiliations
Review

CRISPR/Cas9 and Nanotechnology Pertinence in Agricultural Crop Refinement

Banavath Jayanna Naik et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9) method is a versatile technique that can be applied in crop refinement. Currently, the main reasons for declining agricultural yield are global warming, low rainfall, biotic and abiotic stresses, in addition to soil fertility issues caused by the use of harmful chemicals as fertilizers/additives. The declining yields can lead to inadequate supply of nutritional food as per global demand. Grains and horticultural crops including fruits, vegetables, and ornamental plants are crucial in sustaining human life. Genomic editing using CRISPR/Cas9 and nanotechnology has numerous advantages in crop development. Improving crop production using transgenic-free CRISPR/Cas9 technology and produced fertilizers, pesticides, and boosters for plants by adopting nanotechnology-based protocols can essentially overcome the universal food scarcity. This review briefly gives an overview on the potential applications of CRISPR/Cas9 and nanotechnology-based methods in developing the cultivation of major agricultural crops. In addition, the limitations and major challenges of genome editing in grains, vegetables, and fruits have been discussed in detail by emphasizing its applications in crop refinement strategy.

Keywords: Cas9; Cas9 activators; biotic and abiotic stress; horticultural crops; nano-fertilizers; nanoparticles; nutritional value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Targeted genome editing via CRISPR-Cas9. (A) The CRISPR-Cas9 system comprises of a Cas9 protein and guide RNA. Guide RNAs regulate the target DNA specificity by sequence complementarity. (B) gRNA and Cas9 protein form a binary complex that specifically cleaves target DNA creating a double-strand DNA break. (C) Cellular DNA repair mechanisms: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR), repairs the double strand DNA break. In the process, short insertions, deletions, nucleotide substitutions, or gene insertion may occur. Reproduced with permission from El-Mounadi et al. (2020) Frontiers.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic illustration of the steps involved in CRISPR/Cas9 Genetic Transformation; (A) Specific gene selection, (B) sgRNA designing for the specific gene, (C) vector construction, (D) transformation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system via Agrobacterium, (E) callus induction from agrobacterium infected explants, (F) plant regeneration from callus, (G) T0 CRISPR/Cas9 mutated transgenic plants, (H) screening of transgenic plants by PCR, (I) identification of mutated plants by T7E1, (J) detection of transgenics by sanger sequencing, (K) various techniques to detect transgenic plants, (L) self-pollination of T0 transgenic plants for generation of homozygous T1 plants, (M) mutated T0 seeds, (N) Generation of transgene- free T1 progeny, (O) Phenotypic analysis of T1 plants. Reproduced with permission from Manghwar et al. (2019) CellPress.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Nanotechnology-based agriculturally important nano-fertilizers, which are increasing the agronomic productivity, efficiency, and reduce environmental stress. Although showed the improved applications in agriculture by nanotechnology and Types of stresses overcome by nanotechnology. Reproduced with permission from Mittal et al. (2020) Frontiers.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Nanomaterial-mediated plant genetic engineering. Functionalized nanomaterials can provide a delivery platform that is capable of traversing barriers (e.g., multilayered cell walls) to deliver exogenous plasmid DNA (pDNA) and siRNA into intact plant cells. CNTs, carbon nanotubes; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticles; MNP, magnet nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from Peng et al. (2019) CellPress.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdallah N. A., Prakash C. S., Hughen A. G. (2014). Genome editing for crop improvement: challenges and opportunities. GM Crops Food 6 183–205. 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abe K., Araki E., Suzuki Y., Toki S., Saika H. (2018). Production of high oleic/low linoleic rice by genome editing. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 131 58–62. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adli M. (2018). The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat. Commun. 9:1911. 10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmar S., Mahmood T., Fiaz S., Poblet F., Shafique M. S., Chattha M. S., et al. (2021). Advantage of nanotechnology-based genome editing system and its application in crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 12:663849. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Amin N., Ahmad N., Wu N., Pu X., Ma T., Du Y., et al. (2019). CRISPR-Cas9 mediated targeted disruption of FAD2-2 microsomal omega-6 desaturase in soybean (Glycine max.L). BMC Biotechnol. 19:501. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources